Literature DB >> 11244208

Endarterectomy for carotid stenosis: new approaches in patient selection.

H J Barnett1, H E Meldrum.   

Abstract

Results of randomized trials on carotid endarterectomy make it mandatory that therapeutic decisions for patients with carotid stenosis consider the degree of stenosis, presence of symptoms, skill of surgeon and time since the last ischemic event. Patients with severe (>70% by angiogram) stenosis should receive carotid endarterectomy, provided the operative risk is <6% and symptoms have recurred within 6 months. With moderate stenosis (50--69% by angiogram), and with similar low operative risk and time limit, males with hemispheric, nondisabling stroke and appropriate CT lesion will benefit from carotid endarterectomy. Patients with TIA only, retinal symptoms alone and who are women are not going to benefit in this range of stenosis. Particularly at risk with medical care alone are symptomatic patients with coexistent intracranial stenosis, widespread white-matter lesions, intraluminal thrombi, contralateral occlusion and absence of good collateral circulation. The same high-risk patients, enjoy good long-term results from endarterectomy. Lacunar syndromes at presentation respond to endarterectomy, but with less benefit. Symptomatic patients do as well, regardless of age, provided patients with serious cardiac disorders and with organ failure are avoided. Serious doubt exists about indications for endarterectomy in asymptomatic subjects. Even if the upper limit of 3% perioperative risk is exceeded (and in large institutional databases and other studies, it usually is), the risk of large-artery strokes from the asymptomatic lesion is only slightly above the risk facing these subjects from lacunar and cardioembolic stroke. To prevent 1 large-artery stroke in 5 years in asymptomatic subjects requires that 111 subjects be submitted to endarterectomy. Copyright 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11244208     DOI: 10.1159/000049133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis        ISSN: 1015-9770            Impact factor:   2.762


  4 in total

1.  Quality improvement guidelines for the performance of cervical carotid angioplasty and stent placement.

Authors:  John D Barr; John J Connors; David Sacks; Joan C Wojak; Gary J Becker; John F Cardella; Bohdan Chopko; Jacques E Dion; Allan J Fox; Randall T Higashida; Robert W Hurst; Curtis A Lewis; Terence A S Matalon; Gary M Nesbit; J Arliss Pollock; Eric J Russell; David J Seidenwurm; Robert C Wallace
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Spect measurements of regional cerebral perfusion and carbondioxide reactivity: correlation with cerebral collaterals in internal carotid artery occlusive disease.

Authors:  Michiel J de Boorder; Jeroen van der Grond; Alice J van Dongen; Catharina J M Klijn; L Jaap Kappelle; Peter P Van Rijk; Jeroen Hendrikse
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Multidetector CT angiography of the Circle of Willis: association of its variants with carotid artery disease and brain ischemia.

Authors:  Andrea Varga; Giovanni Di Leo; Péter Vince Banga; Csaba Csobay-Novák; Márton Kolossváry; Pál Maurovich-Horvat; Kálmán Hüttl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Different Grades of Collateral Circulation for Evaluating Cerebral Hemodynamic Status in Carotid Artery Stenosis.

Authors:  Weijian Fan; Weihao Shi; Jianjie Rong; Wencheng Guo; Shuangshuang Lu; Jinyun Tan; Bo Yu
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 2.682

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.