Literature DB >> 11243480

Effector-dependent acquisition of novel typing sequences.

R Parasher1, S Roy, A M Gordon.   

Abstract

In an earlier report we found that when pairs of letters were physically transposed on the keyboard and typists were required to type letters in their new location, the disruptions in typing were reduced when the transpositions involved mirror movements of homologous fingers of the two hands compared with transpositions involving the same hand. We hypothesized that acquisition may be facilitated when a new movement mirrors a previously learned movement. In order to test this hypothesis, in the present study we transposed various pairs of letters between the two hands. Experienced typists (n = 6) typed phrases in which a key was physically transposed with another key on the keyboard and subjects typed the letters in their new location (for 200 trials). The pairs of transpositions involved: (1) similar movements of homologous fingers; (2) different movements of homologous fingers; (3) similar movements of non-homologous fingers; and (4) different movements of non-homologous fingers. After the transposition of keys, there were non-uniform prolongations in the typing intervals of words containing transposed keys, with the largest delay occurring directly before the transposition. Practice had a differential effect on these intervals; some key press intervals achieved control levels, while others did not improve at all. The disruptions in typing were dependent on the specific keys transposed. Transpositions involving non-homologous digits of the two hands were less disruptive than transpositions involving homologous digits. The results do not support our earlier hypothesis that acquisition may be facilitated when a new movement mirrors a previously learned one. These results provide some possible insights into how distinct levels of movement organization develop in typing as a result of practice. Furthermore, the non-uniformity of the typing intervals in the words containing transposed keys supports the notion that typing is organized at multiple levels, including the individual key press and word level.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11243480     DOI: 10.1007/s002210000592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  3 in total

1.  Stimulus-dependent modulation of perceptual and motor learning in a serial reaction time task.

Authors:  Waldemar Kirsch; Joachim Hoffmann
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2012-05-21

2.  Interference to consolidation phase gains in learning a novel movement sequence by handwriting: dependence on laterality and the level of experience with the written sequence.

Authors:  Meirav Balas; Shai Netser; Nir Giladi; Avi Karni
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 2.064

3.  Effects of motor restrictions on preparatory brain activity.

Authors:  L Sperl; J M Ruttloff; G G Ambrus; J M Kaufmann; R Cañal-Bruland; S R Schweinberger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 1.972

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.