Literature DB >> 11243370

Sensitivity and specificity of the complement fixation test for detection of cattle persistently infected with Anaplasma marginale.

D S Bradway1, S Torioni de Echaide, D P Knowles, S G Hennager, T F McElwain.   

Abstract

The complement fixation (CF) test commonly is used to identify cattle infected with Anaplasma marginale prior to interstate or international movement. Estimates of the accuracy of the CF test in detecting animals persistently infected with A. marginale vary widely. In this study, the sensitivity and specificity of the CF test for detection of carrier animals was determined using serum from 232 cattle previously defined as A. marginale positive or negative by nested polymerase chain reaction methods and hybridization. Considering results from 2 independent laboratories and interpreting a 1:5 suspect reaction as positive, the best estimate of CF test sensitivity was 20%, with a specificity of 98%. Using a 1:10 cutoff, sensitivity decreased to 14% and specificity increased to 99%. Results of this study indicate that the CF test is ineffective for identifying cattle persistently infected with A. marginale and thus is inadequate for anaplasmosis regulatory and surveillance programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11243370     DOI: 10.1177/104063870101300117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest        ISSN: 1040-6387            Impact factor:   1.279


  10 in total

1.  Seroprevalence of Anaplasma marginale in 2 Iowa feedlots and its association with morbidity, mortality, production parameters, and carcass traits.

Authors:  Johann F Coetzee; Peggy L Schmidt; Annette M O'Connor; Michael D Apley
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Comparison of iatrogenic transmission of Anaplasma marginale in Holstein steers via needle and needle-free injection techniques.

Authors:  James B Reinbold; Johann F Coetzee; Larry C Hollis; Jason S Nickell; Casey M Riegel; Julia A Christopher; Roman R Ganta
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.156

3.  A new PCR-RFLP method for detection of Anaplasma marginale based on 16S rRNA.

Authors:  Vahid Noaman; Parviz Shayan
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 2.459

Review 4.  Antigens and alternatives for control of Anaplasma marginale infection in cattle.

Authors:  Katherine M Kocan; José de la Fuente; Alberto A Guglielmone; Roy D Meléndez
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Prevalence of antibodies to bluetongue virus and Anaplasma marginale in Montana yearling cattle entering Alberta feedlots: Fall 2001.

Authors:  Joyce Van Donkersgoed; Arnold Gertonson; Marc Bridges; Dick Raths; David Dargatz; Bruce Wagner; Alice Boughton; Doug Knoop; Thomas E Walton
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.008

6.  Comparison of Microscopy and PCR-RFLP for detection of Anaplasma marginale in carrier cattle.

Authors:  V Noaman; P Shayan
Journal:  Iran J Microbiol       Date:  2010-06

7.  PCR and ELISA vis-à-vis microscopy for detection of bovine anaplasmosis: a study on associated risk of an upcoming problem in North India.

Authors:  Amrita Sharma; L D Singla; Paramjit Kaur; M S Bal
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2015-02-25

8.  Diagnostic tools of caprine and ovine anaplasmosis: a direct comparative study.

Authors:  I I Shabana; N M Alhadlag; H Zaraket
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 2.741

9.  Evaluation of an Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay for the Detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum Antigen in Ovine Buffy Coat Smears.

Authors:  Labrini V Athanasiou; Constantina N Tsokana; Eleni G Katsogiannou; Sofia Boutsini; Panagiotis D Katsoulos
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-01-25

10.  Serosurveillance for livestock pathogens in free-ranging mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus).

Authors:  Annette Roug; Pamela Swift; Steven Torres; Karen Jones; Christine K Johnson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.