Literature DB >> 11243361

A comparison of diagnostic assays for the detection of type A swine influenza virus from nasal swabs and lungs.

S L Swenson1, L L Vincent, B M Lute, B H Janke, K E Lechtenberg, J G Landgraf, B J Schmitt, D R Kinker, J K McMillen.   

Abstract

Nasal swabs and lung samples from pigs experimentally infected with H1N1 swine influenza virus (SIV) were examined for the presence of SIV by the indirect fluorescent antibody assay, immunohistochemistry, cell culture virus isolation, egg inoculation, and 2 human enzyme immunoassays (membrane enzyme immunoassay, microwell enzyme immunoassay). Egg inoculation was considered to be the gold standard for assay evaluation. The 2 human enzyme immunoassays (EIA) and egg inoculation agreed 100% for the prechallenge nasal swabs. Agreement on SIV identification in nasal swabs with egg inoculation following challenge was considered to be good to excellent for membrane EIA (kappa = 0.85) and microwell EIA (kappa = 0.86). Agreement on SIV identification in lung tissue with egg inoculation following challenge was good to excellent for membrane EIA (kappa = 0.75), fair for microwell EIA, fluorescent antibody, and cell culture virus isolation (kappa = 0.48, 0.64, 0.62, respectively), and poor for immunohistochemistry (kappa = 0.36). No assay was 100% accurate, including the "gold standard," egg inoculation. In light of this information, it is important to consider clinical signs of disease and a thorough herd history in conjunction with diagnostic results to make a diagnosis of SIV infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11243361     DOI: 10.1177/104063870101300108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest        ISSN: 1040-6387            Impact factor:   1.279


  6 in total

1.  Establishment and characterization of a Madin-Darby canine kidney reporter cell line for influenza A virus assays.

Authors:  M Jaber Hossain; Sandra Perez; Zhu Guo; Li-Mei Chen; Ruben O Donis
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of embryonated chicken eggs with MDCK cell culture for the isolation of swine influenza virus.

Authors:  Alfonso Clavijo; Dina B Tresnan; Rika Jolie; En-Min Zhou
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.310

3.  Comparative Susceptibility of Madin-Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) Derived Cell Lines for Isolation of Swine Origin Influenza A Viruses from Different Clinical Specimens.

Authors:  Matthew Suderman; Mariko Moniwa; Tamiru N Alkie; Davor Ojkic; Andre Broes; Neil Pople; Yohannes Berhane
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 4.  Optimal Use of Vaccines for Control of Influenza A Virus in Swine.

Authors:  Matthew R Sandbulte; Anna R Spickler; Pamela K Zaabel; James A Roth
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2015-01-30

5.  Experimental infection of pigs with H1 and H3 influenza A viruses of swine by using intranasal nebulization.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Takemae; Ryota Tsunekuni; Yuko Uchida; Toshihiro Ito; Takehiko Saito
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 6.  Diagnostics and surveillance for Swine influenza.

Authors:  Susan Detmer; Marie Gramer; Sagar Goyal; Montserrat Torremorell; Jerry Torrison
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.291

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.