Literature DB >> 11243291

Short cervix: a cause of preterm delivery in young adolescents?

C Stevens-Simon1, J Barrett, J A McGregor, J French, W Persutte.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that at midgestation younger adolescents (<16 years of age at conception) have shorter cervices than older adolescents (16-19 years of age at conception).
METHODS: At midgestation (22.9 +/- 2.4 weeks) we measured cervical length by transvaginal ultrasound in a group of 46 13-19-year-old participants in an intensive, adolescent-oriented, antenatal program. Subjects were also comprehensively screened and treated for other recognized physiologic, microbiologic, obstetric, behavioral, and psychosocial factors associated with preterm delivery. Univariate, bivariate, and logistic regression analyses were used.
RESULTS: The 18 younger adolescents had significantly shorter cervices than the 28 older adolescents (30 +/- 11 mm vs. 39 +/- 8 mm; P = 0.002). The younger adolescents' cervices were also more likely to be < or =25 mm long (33% and 4%, respectively; P = 0.02) and to exhibit funneling (39% vs. 4%; P = 0.01). Teenagers with cervices < or =25 mm long were younger, thinner, more apt to report vaginal bleeding and substance abuse, and to be treated for preterm labor (71% vs. 21%; P = 0.005). Logistic regression analyses revealed that age <16 years at conception (odds ratio = 13.7; 95% CI: 1.3-151.4) and substance abuse (odds ratio = 8.5; 95% CI: 1.2-62.8) were associated with cervical length < or =25 mm. Cervical length < or =25 mm was the only significant predictor of preterm delivery (odds ratio = 26.2; 95% CI: 2.1-333.6; P = 0.01) in this population of adolescents who were routinely treated for other recognized causes of preterm delivery.
CONCLUSIONS: Cervical length < or =25 mm and cervical funneling may be complications of conception prior to 16 years of age. Randomized trials are needed to determine if younger adolescents benefit preferentially from ultrasound screening for short cervix at midgestation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11243291     DOI: 10.1002/1520-6661(200011/12)9:6<342::AID-MFM1004>3.0.CO;2-D

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Matern Fetal Med        ISSN: 1057-0802


  4 in total

1.  Effect of Young Maternal Age on Obstetric and Perinatal Outcomes: Results from the Tertiary Center in Turkey.

Authors:  Oya Demirci; Ertuğrul Yılmaz; Özgür Tosun; Pınar Kumru; Arzu Arınkan; Didar Mahmutoğlu; Selçuk Selçuk; Zehra Nihal Dolgun; Resul Arısoy; Emre Erdoğdu; Nazan Tarhan
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 2.021

Review 2.  The impact of early age at first childbirth on maternal and infant health.

Authors:  Cassandra M Gibbs; Amanda Wendt; Stacey Peters; Carol J Hogue
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.980

3.  Differences in pregnancy outcomes, prenatal care utilization, and maternal complications between teenagers and adult women in Korea: A nationwide epidemiological study.

Authors:  Sang Hyung Lee; Seung Mi Lee; Nam Gu Lim; Hyun Joo Kim; Sung-Hee Bae; Minsu Ock; Un-Na Kim; Jin Yong Lee; Min-Woo Jo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Characteristics and adverse outcomes of Chinese adolescent pregnancies between 2012 and 2019.

Authors:  Yanxia Xie; Xiaodong Wang; Yi Mu; Zheng Liu; Yanping Wang; Xiaohong Li; Li Dai; Qi Li; Mingrong Li; Peiran Chen; Jun Zhu; Juan Liang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.