Literature DB >> 11242791

The effect of electrothermal cautery-assisted resection of diminutive colonic polyps on histopathologic diagnosis.

N S Goldstein1, J C Watts, J S Neill, L M Vogel, D Barkel, O Kadro, S Priest, S Klein.   

Abstract

We examined diminutive colonic polyps to identify relationships between thermal electrocoagulation or resection trauma cytologic artifacts, type of thermal electrocoagulation, polyp size, and the interobserver variation among 3 pathologists. The 3 pathologists independently evaluated 119 colonic polyps 5 mm or less in maximum dimension for diagnosis and degree of thermal electrocoagulation or resection trauma cytologic artifacts. The maximum dimension of the polyps and type of thermal electrocoagulation were recorded. The average percentage of polyps in which a definitive diagnosis could not be made because of cytologic artifacts was 16.5% (range, 11.8%-19.3%). Decreasing polyp size was associated linearly with the inability to make a definitive diagnosis owing to cytologic artifacts. Polyps smaller than 2 mm significantly more often could not be definitively diagnosed by at least 1 pathologist owing to cytologic artifacts, including some polyps that were excised without thermal electrocautery. Interobserver variation increased with decreasing polyp dimension. Two millimeters seems to represent a cut point, below which the likelihood that a definitive diagnosis can be made can be increased if thermal electrocoagulation is used. This small size seems to make them especially susceptible to cytologically injurious forces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11242791     DOI: 10.1309/0KPE-1RG6-KA78-R49Y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  8 in total

1.  Advances in colonoscopy.

Authors:  Nicholas Tutticci; Michael J Bourke
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06

2.  The histological quality and adequacy of diminutive colorectal polyps resected using jumbo versus hot biopsy forceps.

Authors:  Bulent Yasar; Huseyin Kayadibi; Evren Abut; Dilek Benek; Koray Kochan; Can Gonen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Nuclear artifacts in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection specimens: A clinicopathological study.

Authors:  Susumu Matsukuma; Hiroaki Takeo; Kimiya Sato
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-20

4.  Histomorphological features of resected bladder tumors: Do energy source makes any difference.

Authors:  Ashish Kumar Saini; Arvind Ahuja; Amlesh Seth; Prem Nath Dogra; Rajeev Kumar; Prabhjot Singh; Siddhartha Dutta Gupta
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

5.  Should hot biopsy forceps be abandoned for polypectomy of diminutive colorectal polyps?

Authors:  Vasileios Panteris; Antonios Vezakis; J K Triantafillidis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Clinical outcomes of positive resection margin after endoscopic mucosal resection of early colon cancers.

Authors:  Junseok Park; Hyun Gun Kim; Shin Ok Jeong; Hoon Gil Jo; Hyo Yeop Song; Jeeyeon Kim; Seri Ryu; Youngyun Cho; Hyun Jin Youn; Seong Ran Jeon; Jin-Oh Kim; Bong Min Ko; Yoon Mi Jeen; So-Young Jin
Journal:  Intest Res       Date:  2019-05-31

7.  Endoscopic resection is more effective than biopsy or EUS to detect residual rectal neuroendocrine tumor.

Authors:  Matthew W Stier; Christopher G Chapman; Steven Shamah; Kianoush Donboli; Lindsay Yassan; Irving Waxman; Uzma D Siddiqui
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2021-01-01

8.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal polyps: outcome determining factors.

Authors:  Chi Woo Samuel Chow; Tak Lit Derek Fung; Pak Tat Chan; Kam Hung Kwok
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 3.453

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.