PURPOSE: Age bias may play a role in physicians' discussions of equivalent therapeutic options with patients, especially in respect to breast-conservation therapy. This study investigated bias based on age (ageism) among physicians-in-training in their treatment recommendations for breast-conserving procedures. METHOD: Second-year medical students responded to a questionnaire concerning recommendations they would make for breast conservation or mastectomies with or without breast reconstruction for eight patients with similar-stage breast cancer. The patients differed by age (older were > or =59 years, younger < or =31 years), race, and marital status. A total of 116 students made 1,146 recommendations. Percentages of the students' recommendations for breast-conservation therapy (BCT) were calculated for the two patient age groups and for the recommendations for breast reconstruction after the patient had already chosen modified radical mastectomy (MRM). Chi-square tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The students recommended BCT for a significantly higher percentage of younger patients than older patients (86% versus 66%; p<.001). They recommended MRM to 34% of older patients versus 14% of younger patients (p<.001). Furthermore, the students recommended breast reconstruction after MRM to a significantly higher percentage of younger patients than older patients (95% versus 65%; p<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Medical students' recommendations of breast conservation and breast reconstruction showed age bias. Educational efforts should be instituted during the medical school to decrease ageism in students' treatment recommendations.
PURPOSE: Age bias may play a role in physicians' discussions of equivalent therapeutic options with patients, especially in respect to breast-conservation therapy. This study investigated bias based on age (ageism) among physicians-in-training in their treatment recommendations for breast-conserving procedures. METHOD: Second-year medical students responded to a questionnaire concerning recommendations they would make for breast conservation or mastectomies with or without breast reconstruction for eight patients with similar-stage breast cancer. The patients differed by age (older were > or =59 years, younger < or =31 years), race, and marital status. A total of 116 students made 1,146 recommendations. Percentages of the students' recommendations for breast-conservation therapy (BCT) were calculated for the two patient age groups and for the recommendations for breast reconstruction after the patient had already chosen modified radical mastectomy (MRM). Chi-square tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The students recommended BCT for a significantly higher percentage of younger patients than older patients (86% versus 66%; p<.001). They recommended MRM to 34% of older patients versus 14% of younger patients (p<.001). Furthermore, the students recommended breast reconstruction after MRM to a significantly higher percentage of younger patients than older patients (95% versus 65%; p<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Medical students' recommendations of breast conservation and breast reconstruction showed age bias. Educational efforts should be instituted during the medical school to decrease ageism in students' treatment recommendations.
Entities:
Keywords:
Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship