Literature DB >> 11241751

Gross anatomy course content and teaching methodology in allied health: clinicians' experiences and recommendations.

N S Latman1, R Lanier.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to sample the experiences and recommendations of clinicians in allied health fields about gross anatomy courses. The objective was to determine if practicing clinicians recommended a course in gross anatomy, and, if so, their recommendations for course content and teaching methodology. Questionnaires were mailed to a random selection of occupational therapists (OTs), physician assistants (PAs), and physical therapists (PTs) licensed in the state of Texas. In addition to demographics, the survey asked 14 questions regarding the experiences and recommendations in seven areas of interest about gross anatomy courses. The responding sample appeared to be representative of the target population. A course in human gross anatomy during professional school was recommended by 96% of OTs, and 100% of PAs and PTs. The single most recommended teaching method was student dissection of human cadavers. Although significant differences were found regarding primary course orientation, a majority favored some form of combined systems and regional oriented courses. A majority of clinicians in each field recommended a gross anatomy course at the beginning of professional training. Specific recommendations were given for content of systems and regional oriented gross anatomy courses. We recommend that the gross anatomy course content and teaching methodologies in allied health areas be responsive to the specific needs of each clinical specialty. Copyright Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11241751     DOI: 10.1002/1098-2353(200103)14:2<152::AID-CA1024>3.0.CO;2-A

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Anat        ISSN: 0897-3806            Impact factor:   2.414


  7 in total

1.  Do we need dissection in an integrated problem-based learning medical course? Perceptions of first- and second-year students.

Authors:  Samy A Azer; Norm Eizenberg
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Designing anatomy program in modern medical curriculum: matter of balance.

Authors:  Ivica Grković; Maja Marinović Guić; Vana Kosta; Ana Poljicanin; Ana Carić; Katarina Vilović
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.351

3.  Call for Consistency: the Need to Establish Gross Anatomy Learning Objectives for the Entry-Level Physical Therapist.

Authors:  Melissa A Carroll; Mary Tracy-Bee; Alison McKenzie
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2021-04-21

4.  On the job training in the dissection room: from physical therapy graduates to junior anatomy instructors.

Authors:  Smadar Peleg; Tomer Yona; Yuval Almog; Alon Barash; Ruth Pelleg-Kallevag
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.263

5.  Opinions of South African physiotherapists on gross anatomy education for physiotherapy students.

Authors:  Dorothy Shead; Ronel Roos; Benita Olivier; Amadi O Ihunwo
Journal:  S Afr J Physiother       Date:  2019-07-30

6.  A quality improvement apprenticeship: Gross anatomy in the time of Covid-19.

Authors:  April R Hatcher; A Scott Pearson; Kristen M Platt
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 6.652

7.  Physical therapy students' perceptions of team-based learning in gross anatomy using the Team-Based Learning Student Assessment Instrument.

Authors:  Beven Livingston; Mary Lundy; Shana Harrington
Journal:  J Educ Eval Health Prof       Date:  2014-01-18
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.