Literature DB >> 11241254

The Collection of Indirect and Nonmedical Direct Costs (COIN) form: a new tool for collecting the invisible costs of androgen independent prostate carcinoma.

E J Sherman1, D G Pfister, H S Ruchlin, D M Rubin, M H Radzyner, G H Kelleher, S F Slovin, W K Kelly, H I Scher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are limited data available regarding the cost of care in patients with androgen independent prostate carcinoma (AIPC), and there are no data on the impact of direct nonmedical and indirect costs (DNM/IC). This lack of data, along with the feasibility of collecting DNM/IC, was examined in patients with AIPC who took part in a randomized trial using a newly developed questionnaire, the Collection of Indirect and Nonmedical Direct Costs (COIN) form.
METHODS: Patients with AIPC were randomized to one of three treatment arms: 1) strontium only (strontium 4 Mci in Week 1 and Week 12) (STRONT); 2) vinblastine 4 mg/m(2) per week for 3 weeks then 1 week off and estramustine, 10 mg/kg per day (CHEMO); or 3) a combination of treatments outlined in the arms for CHEMO and STRONT (CHEMO/STRONT). Direct medical costs were collected through the hospital billing system. DNM/IC data were obtained prospectively using the COIN form. Cost data were analyzed for a period of 6 months.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were randomized, after which the protocol was closed because of poor accrual. The median survival of the patients was 22.3 months. The mean and median total costs for the 20 of 29 patients with complete cost information were $12,647 and $11,257 over 6 months, respectively. DNM/IC represented 11% of the total cost (range, from < 1% to 42%); in 20% of participating individuals, these costs accounted for 35-42% of total costs. Failure to collect complete cost information was due to early death, administrative difficulties, and loss to follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot project, the collection of these cost data using the COIN form was feasible and practical and was limited primarily by logistic, not form specific, issues. DNM/IC were found to be a significant proportion of total costs (up to 42%) in selected patients, and this information proved to be a useful addition to the cost analysis. Approximately 98 patients would be required to detect a 20% difference in total costs between arms in a properly powered, randomized trial. Considering the potentially significant impact on total costs, DNM/IC data should be included in future cost-analysis studies of patients with AIPC and other diseases. Copyright 2001 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11241254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  9 in total

1.  Acute skin toxicity-related, out-of-pocket expenses in patients with breast cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy: a descriptive, exploratory study.

Authors:  Julie B Schnur; Joshua Graff Zivin; David M K Mattson; Sheryl Green; Lina H Jandorf; A Gabriella Wernicke; Guy H Montgomery
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-03-18       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Understanding Treatment Burden and Quality of Life Impact of Participating in an Early-Phase Pediatric Oncology Clinical Trial: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Stacey Crane; Lori Backus; Beth Stockman; Janet S Carpenter; Li Lin; Joan Haase
Journal:  J Pediatr Oncol Nurs       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 1.636

Review 3.  Surgical perspectives in gastrointestinal disease: a study of quality of life outcomes in esophageal, pancreatic, colon, and rectal cancers.

Authors:  Kate-V Viola; Charlotte Ariyan; Julie-Ann Sosa
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Validity of information obtained from a method for estimating cancer costs from the perspective of patients and caregivers.

Authors:  Sophie Lauzier; Elizabeth Maunsell; Mélanie Drolet; Douglas Coyle; Nicole Hébert-Croteau
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Cost-effectiveness analyses and cost analyses in castration-resistant prostate cancer: A systematic review.

Authors:  Thomas Grochtdreis; Hans-Helmut König; Alexander Dobruschkin; Gunhild von Amsberg; Judith Dams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Socioeconomic status and survival outcomes in elderly cancer patients: A national health insurance service-elderly sample cohort study.

Authors:  Bum-Sup Jang; Ji Hyun Chang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 4.452

7.  Cost-Effectiveness of Bariatric Surgery versus Medication Therapy for Obese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in China: A Markov Analysis.

Authors:  Bin Wan; Nan Fang; Wei Guan; Haixia Ding; Ying Wang; Xin Ge; Hui Liang; Xin Li; Yiyang Zhan
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 4.011

8.  Comparing the Analysis and Results of a Modified Social Accounting Matrix Framework with Conventional Methods of Reporting Indirect Non-Medical Costs.

Authors:  Baudouin Standaert; Christophe Sauboin; Quentin J Leclerc; Mark P Connolly
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Improving Quality and Value of Cancer Care for Older Adults.

Authors:  Erika E Ramsdale; Valerie Csik; Andrew E Chapman; Arash Naeim; Beverly Canin
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2017
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.