Literature DB >> 11241185

Origin of anthropoidea: dental evidence and recognition of early anthropoids in the fossil record, with comments on the Asian anthropoid radiation.

G F Gunnell1, E R Miller.   

Abstract

Among the earliest fossil anthropoid primates known are Catopithecus browni, Serapia eocaena, Arsinoea kallimos, and Proteopithecus sylviae, from the late Eocene quarry L-41, Fayum Depression, Egypt. Two of these taxa, C. browni and S. eocaena, may be the oldest known members of the Propliopithecidae and Parapithecidae, respectively, while A. kallimos and P. sylviae are archaic anthropoids of less certain familial affiliation. Dental features of C. browni, S. eocaena, A. kallimos, and P. sylviae are compared with those of younger propliopithecids and parapithecids from the Fayum in order to determine the morphocline polarities of dental features among these early anthropoids. From this, a basal African anthropoid dental morphotype is constructed. Among the features of this morphotype are: dental formula of 2.1.3.3; incisors subvertically implanted and somewhat spatulate; p2 as large as p3, both lacking paraconids; p4 weakly obliquely oriented but not exodaenodont; all lower molars with small paraconids present; upper anterior premolars lacking protocone; upper molars with small, cingular hypocones, all cheek teeth nonbunodont; and canines projecting but not necessarily sexually dimorphic. Comparisons are made between this African anthropoid morphotype and two of the best-represented proposed basal anthropoids, Eosimias and Djebelemur, with the result that neither appears to be a good candidate to have been ancestral to the African anthropoids. Other possible basal simians such as Algeripithecus, Tabelia, and Biretia also are evaluated but are too poorly known for adequate analysis. The larger-bodied Asian primates Pondaungia, Amphipithecus, and Siamopithecus also are not likely ancestors for African anthropoids, but like Eosimias they may share a common ancestry. Despite many recent claims of an Asian origin for anthropoids, the evidence remains far from compelling. The true origins of Anthropoidea remain obscure. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11241185     DOI: 10.1002/1096-8644(200103)114:3<177::AID-AJPA1019>3.0.CO;2-O

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  4 in total

1.  Additional materials of Myanmarpithecus yarshensis (Amphipithecidae, Primates) from the middle Eocene Pondaung Formation.

Authors:  Naoko Egi; Masanaru Takai; Takehisa Tsubamoto; Nobuo Shigehara
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2005-10-08       Impact factor: 2.163

2.  Modulation of Fgf3 dosage in mouse and men mirrors evolution of mammalian dentition.

Authors:  Cyril Charles; Vincent Lazzari; Paul Tafforeau; Thomas Schimmang; Mustafa Tekin; Ophir Klein; Laurent Viriot
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Phylogenomics of species from four genera of New World monkeys by flow sorting and reciprocal chromosome painting.

Authors:  Francesca Dumas; Roscoe Stanyon; Luca Sineo; Gary Stone; Francesca Bigoni
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 3.260

4.  New Eocene primate from Myanmar shares dental characters with African Eocene crown anthropoids.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Jaeger; Olivier Chavasseau; Vincent Lazzari; Aung Naing Soe; Chit Sein; Anne Le Maître; Hla Shwe; Yaowalak Chaimanee
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 14.919

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.