Literature DB >> 11240741

Adenosarcoma of the uterus: a clinicopathologic, DNA flow cytometric, p53 and mdm-2 analysis of 11 cases.

R. Blom1, C. Guerrieri.   

Abstract

Eleven patients with uterine adenosarcoma diagnosed between 1970 and 1995 were evaluated according to DNA ploidy, S-phase fraction, p53 and mdm-2 expression, and traditional clinical and pathological prognostic factors, such as tumor stage, grade and mitotic index. DNA flow cytometric analysis and immunohistochemical staining for p53 and mdm-2 were performed on paraffin-embedded archival tissue from the uterine tumors. The patients ranged in age from 41 to 90 years (median, 76 years). Only one patient was premenopausal at the time of diagnosis and five (45%) were nulliparous. One patient had received previous pelvic irradiation for anal squamous carcinoma. Six of the tumors (55%) were pure adenosarcoma and five (45%) were adenosarcoma with sarcomatous overgrowth. Nine patients had a stage I tumor and two had a stage II tumor. Among the six adenosarcomas we found three DNA diploid tumors, two DNA aneuploid tumors, and one DNA multiploid tumor. All adenosarcomas had an S-phase fraction less than 10%, except one that was not assessable. None was p53 positive and only one overexpressed mdm-2. All five adenosarcomas with sarcomatous overgrowth were DNA aneuploid, three (60%) had an S-phase fraction > 10%, two (40%) were p53 positive, and one (20%) overexpressed mdm-2. Five of the eleven patients suffered recurrences, and three (60%) of these developed lung metastases. During the observation period four (36%) patients (2 adenosarcomas and 2 adenosarcoma with sarcomatous overgrowth) died of disease, three patients died of intercurrent disease without recurrence, and the remaining four are alive with no evidence of disease. The overall five-year survival rate for all stages was 69%; for patients with AS it was 80%, while for those with adenosarcoma with sarcomatous overgrowth it was 50%. There were no variables which correlated with survival. In conclusion, we found hat the typical adenosarcoma had a tendency to be of low stage, have a lower mitotic rate and an S-phase fraction <10%. On the other hand, adenosarcomas with sarcomatous overgrowth were of high grade, had a high mitotic rate, and were DNA aneuploid with an S-phase fraction >10%. None of the variables studied correlated with survival. Tumors that were p53-positive or overexpressed mdm-2 did not behave worse than their negative counterpart. All patients who recurred with distant metastases died of disease.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 11240741     DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1438.1999.09885.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  8 in total

Review 1.  Current management of uterine sarcomas.

Authors:  Elena García-Martínez; Lucas Egea Prefasi; Jesús García-Donas; Pedro Pablo Escolar-Pérez; Francisco Pastor; Antonio González-Martín
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 2.  Uterine Adenosarcoma: a Review.

Authors:  Michael J Nathenson; Vinod Ravi; Nicole Fleming; Wei-Lien Wang; Anthony Conley
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 3.  Cervical Mullerian adenosarcoma with heterologous sarcomatous overgrowth: a fourth case and review of literature.

Authors:  Tito Silvio Patrelli; Salvatore Gizzo; Stefania Di Gangi; Giorgia Guidi; Mario Rondinelli; Giovanni Battista Nardelli
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Whole-Genome Sequencing and Target Validation Analysis of Müllerian Adenosarcoma: A Tumor With Complex but Specific Genetic Alterations.

Authors:  Yanli Ban; Jean V Fischer; Kruti P Maniar; Haiyang Guo; Chang Zeng; Yinuo Li; Qing Zhang; Xinkun Wang; Wei Zhang; Serdar E Bulun; Jian-Jun Wei
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Case Report: Uterine Adenosarcoma With Sarcomatous Overgrowth and Malignant Heterologous Elements.

Authors:  Yunuén I García-Mendoza; Mario Murguia-Perez; Aldo I Galván-Linares; Saulo Mendoza-Ramírez; Norma L García-Salinas; Julio G Moctezuma-Ramírez; Blanca O Murillo-Ortiz; Luis Jonathan Bueno-Rosario; Marco A Olvera-Olvera; Guillermo E Corredor-Alonso
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-10

6.  Epidemiology of adenosarcoma and the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) adjusted survival analysis of lymph node dissection in uterine adenosarcoma.

Authors:  Hanjie Hu; Zhewen Wei; Hong Zhao; Guangwen Yuan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Uterine mullerian adenosarcoma with sarcomatous overgrowth fatal recurrence within two weeks of diagnosis: a case report.

Authors:  Mirna H Farhat; Elie M Hobeika; Ghada Moumneh; Anwar H Nassar
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2007-09-25

8.  Treatment of Recurrent or Metastatic Uterine Adenosarcoma.

Authors:  Michael J Nathenson; Anthony P Conley; Heather Lin; Nicole Fleming; Vinod Ravi
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2017-12-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.