Literature DB >> 11240444

Interest of Clinitek Microalbumin in screening for microalbuminuria: results of a multicentre study in 302 diabetic patients.

J P Le Floch1, M Marre, M Rodier, P Passa.   

Abstract

A prospective survey was performed in 302 consecutive diabetic outpatients from 3 French diabetic centres to study the sensitivity and specificity of screening for microalbuminuria using Clinitek Microalbumin. Urinary samples with positive (at least one +) proteinuria, hematuria, leucocyturia, or nitrates using the Multistix strip were excluded from the study. Results obtained with Clinitek Microalbumin were compared to those observed with the reference method of the biological laboratory of the centre on the same urinary sample. A positive result was defined as an albumin-to-creatinine ratio > or =30 mg/g. Results were described in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and likelihood ratio. Agreement rates were compared with the Kappa test. In the study population, 48 patients (17%) had a positive microalbuminuria with reference assay. However, different rates were found in each site (25%, 11%, and 15%, respectively, p<0.001). Using the Clinitek Microalbumin, a positive result was found among 86 patients (29%), (39%, 26%, and 23%, respectively). A good agreement was observed in the population as a whole (81%, K=0.47 +/- 0.06) and in each site (77%, 81%, 84%, respectively). Sensitivity was 79% (82%, 80%, 75%), specificity 81% (76%, 81%, 85%), positive predictive value 46% (53%, 35%, 46%), negative predictive value 95% (93%, 97%, 95%), and positive likelihood ratio 4.2 (3.4, 4.3, 5.0, respectively). Due to the excellent negative predictive value, these results suggest that Clinitek Microalbumin is a good screening test for microalbuminuria. Positive results should be confirmed using a reference assay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11240444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Metab        ISSN: 1262-3636            Impact factor:   6.041


  9 in total

Review 1.  Urinary strips for protein assays: easy to do but difficult to interpret!

Authors:  Guillaume Résimont; Laurence Piéroni; Edith Bigot-Corbel; Etienne Cavalier; Pierre Delanaye
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.902

2.  Blood pressure components and end-stage renal disease in persons with chronic kidney disease: the Kidney Early Evaluation Program (KEEP).

Authors:  Carmen A Peralta; Keith C Norris; Suying Li; Tara I Chang; Manjula K Tamura; Stacey E Jolly; George Bakris; Peter A McCullough; Michael Shlipak
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-01-09

3.  Diagnostic accuracy of semiquantitative point of care urine albumin to creatinine ratio and urine dipstick analysis in a primary care resource limited setting in South Africa.

Authors:  June Fabian; Jaya A George; Sean D Currin; Mwawi S Gondwe; Nokthula B Mayindi; Shingirai Chipungu; Bongekile L Khoza; Stephen Tollman
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 2.388

4.  Albuminuria and Diabetic Retinopathy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Sankara Nethralaya Diabetic Retinopathy Epidemiology And Molecular Genetic Study (SN-DREAMS, report 12).

Authors:  Padmaja K Rani; Rajiv Raman; Aditi Gupta; Swakshyar S Pal; Vaitheeswaran Kulothungan; Tarun Sharma
Journal:  Diabetol Metab Syndr       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.320

5.  Screening for Nephropathy in Diabetes Mellitus: Is Micral-Test Valid among All Diabetics?

Authors:  Koubaa Afifa; Sriha Belguith Asma; Harzallah Nabil; Bellaleh Ahlem; Sahtout Mounira; Younes Kawthar; Triki Sonia; Hellara Ilhem; Neffati Fadoua; Najjar Fadhel; Soltani Mohamed
Journal:  Int J Chronic Dis       Date:  2016-05-18

6.  Comparison of Urine Albumin-to-Creatinine Ratio (ACR) Between ACR Strip Test and Quantitative Test in Prediabetes and Diabetes.

Authors:  Eun Hee Nah; Seon Cho; Suyoung Kim; Han Ik Cho
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.464

7.  Can a semi-quantitative method replace the current quantitative method for the annual screening of microalbuminuria in patients with diabetes? Diagnostic accuracy and cost-saving analysis considering the potential health burden.

Authors:  Yaerim Kim; Seokwoo Park; Myung-Hee Kim; Sang Hoon Song; Won Mok Lee; Hye Soon Kim; Kyubok Jin; Seungyeup Han; Yong Chul Kim; Seung Seok Han; Hajeong Lee; Jung Pyo Lee; Kwon Wook Joo; Chun Soo Lim; Yon Su Kim; Dong Ki Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of urine dipstick testing for albumin-to-creatinine ratio and albuminuria: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jhonatan R Mejia; Jose Ernesto Fernandez-Chinguel; Gandy Dolores-Maldonado; Naysha Becerra-Chauca; Sergio Goicochea-Lugo; Percy Herrera-Añazco; Jessica Hanae Zafra-Tanaka; Alvaro Taype-Rondan
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-10-23

Review 9.  Comparison of commonly used assays for the detection of microalbuminuria.

Authors:  Douglas E Busby; George L Bakris
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.738

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.