Literature DB >> 11240235

Subset analysis of RTOG 85-31 and 86-10 indicates an advantage for long-term vs. short-term adjuvant hormones for patients with locally advanced nonmetastatic prostate cancer treated with radiation therapy.

E M Horwitz1, K Winter, G E Hanks, C A Lawton, A H Russell, M Machtay.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The benefit of adjuvant hormones in prostate cancer patients receiving definitive radiation therapy (RT) in RTOG 85-31 and 86-10 has previously been reported. This analysis excludes those patients with positive lymph nodes or postprostatectomy to determine the benefit of adjuvant hormones in men with locally advanced nonmetastatic prostate cancer receiving definitive RT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Nine hundred ninety-three eligible patients from RTOG 85-31 and 86-10 treated between 1987-1992 were included in this study. Five hundred seventy-five patients with T3N0M0 disease were included from RTOG 85-31 and 418 patients with T2b-T4N0M0 disease from RTOG 86-10. Patients randomized to receive long-term hormones (LTH) on 85-31 received goserelin starting the last week of RT and continued indefinitely. Patients treated with short-term hormones (STH) on 86-10 received goserelin and flutamide 2 months prior to and during RT. The median follow-up for all patients in this analysis was 71 months (range, 0.6-129 months).
RESULTS: Combining both studies, statistically significant improvements in outcome were observed between the RT and hormones (I) and RT alone (II) groups for biochemical disease-free survival (bNED control) and distant metastases failure (DMF). Statistically significant improvements in bNED control, DMF and cause-specific failure (CSF) were observed for patients receiving LTH compared with STH. In those patients receiving LTH, the benefit in bNED control (p = 0.0002), DMF (p = 0.05), and CSF (p = 0.02) was limited to centrally reviewed Gleason score of 7 and 8-10 tumors. For all patients treated on 85-31, statistically significant improvements for bNED control, DMF, and CSF were observed between Group I and II. Multivariate analysis demonstrated Gleason score and the use of LTH to be independent predictors for bNED control (p < 0.0001), DMF (p < 0.0001), and CSF (p < 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: Based on this analysis, adjuvant long-term hormones compared to short-term hormones resulted in statistically significant improvements in bNED control, DMF, and CSF rates for patients with locally advanced nonmetastatic prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11240235     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)01443-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  10 in total

Review 1.  Short-term versus long-term hormone therapy plus radiotherapy or prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhi-Rui Zhou; Xiao-Dong Zhu; Jun Xia; Zhang-Yu Zou; Song Qu; Xian-Tao Zeng; Zhi Mao; Zhong-Guo Liang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 2.  The efficacy of conventional external beam, three-dimensional conformal, intensity-modulated, particle beam radiation, and brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Tony Y Eng; Join Y Luh; Charles R Thomas
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  70 Gy or more: which dose for which prostate cancer?

Authors:  U Ganswindt; F Paulsen; A G Anastasiadis; A Stenzl; M Bamberg; C Belka
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 4.  Neo-adjuvant and adjuvant hormone therapy for localised and locally advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  S Kumar; M Shelley; C Harrison; B Coles; T J Wilt; M D Mason
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

5.  Radiotherapy combined with hormonal therapy in prostate cancer: the state of the art.

Authors:  Piotr Milecki; Piotr Martenka; Andrzej Antczak; Zbigniew Kwias
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 3.989

6.  Radical prostatectomy and intraoperative radiation therapy in high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Giansilvio Marchioro; Alessandro Volpe; Roberto Tarabuzzi; Giuseppina Apicella; Marco Krengli; Carlo Terrone
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2012-01-30

7.  Combination of celecoxib with percutaneous radiotherapy in patients with localised prostate cancer - a phase I study.

Authors:  U Ganswindt; W Budach; V Jendrossek; G Becker; M Bamberg; C Belka
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2006-04-10       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Phase III pilot study of dose escalation using conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: PSA control and side effects.

Authors:  D P Dearnaley; E Hall; D Lawrence; R A Huddart; R Eeles; C M Nutting; J Gadd; A Warrington; M Bidmead; A Horwich
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-02-14       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 9.  Early versus late hormonal therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hiroshi Miyamoto; Edward M Messing
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.862

10.  Expanded risk groups help determine which prostate radiotherapy sub-group may benefit from adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy.

Authors:  Matthew Beasley; Scott G Williams; Tom Pickles
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 3.481

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.