New developments in the immunosuppressive drug monitoring of cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and azathioprine.

The calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine and tacrolimus form the cornerstones of most immunosuppression protocols. Because of their variable pharmacokinetics, and their narrow therapeutic indices, post-transplant immunosuppressive drug monitoring is an essential part of patient care to minimize the risks of toxicity or acute rejection. Furthermore, a reduction in the rate of acute rejection has been shown to result in a lower rate of graft loss due to chronic rejection. The introduction of the microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine with its more consistent bioavailability has renewed interest in the use of alternative sampling strategies to the trough cyclosporine concentration. Both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations support the concept that determination of cyclosporine during the absorption phase (0-4 h) might offer a better prediction of cyclosporine immunosuppressive efficacy. Initial investigations suggest that monitoring a 2-h postdose concentration C(2) may provide a more efficacious alternative to trough monitoring for optimizing therapy with Neoral. Tacrolimus has a 10- to 100-fold greater in vitro immunosuppressive activity compared with cyclosporine. Consistent with its greater potency, therapeutic whole blood trough concentrations for tacrolimus are around 20-fold lower than the corresponding cyclosporine concentrations. The correlation between toxicity and tacrolimus trough concentrations appears to be stronger than that for acute rejection. The results from a concentration-ranging trial in primary kidney-transplantation and liver-transplantation trials all found a significant relationship between toxicity and tacrolimus trough levels. Azathioprine is converted in vivo to 6-mercaptopurine, which is subsequently metabolized to the pharmacologically active 6-thioguanine nucleotides. The latter are also responsible for the cytotoxic side effects. Reliance on blood counts to monitor azathioprine therapy can be misleading, and they do not provide information on immunosuppresive efficacy. More pertinent information can be obtained through the measurement of thiopurine S-methyltransferase activity and the quantification of intracellular 6-thioguanine nucleotides concentrations in red blood cells. Prospective studies have demonstrated the clinical utility of determining 6-thioguanine nucleotides to individualise immunosuppressive therapy with azathioprine not only in the field of transplantation, but also in inflammatory bowel disease.