Literature DB >> 11239346

Evaluation of healing of the injured posterior cruciate ligament: Analysis of instability and magnetic resonance imaging.

Toshihiro Akisue1, Masahiro Kurosaka, Shinichi Yoshiya, Ryosuke Kuroda, Kosaku Mizuno.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Knees with an acute posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injury and soft endpoint on posterior drawer test often develop less instability and a firm endpoint at later follow-up. This type of healing is rarely seen in the acutely injured anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and seems to be a unique feature of healing for PCL injury. The purpose of this study was to explore the healing process of the injured PCL by means of instability measurement and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Type of study: Consecutive sample.
METHODS: Forty-eight acute PCL deficient knees were followed up and evaluated. We evaluated the detection of a so-called firm endpoint using a posterior drawer test. We also determined the degree of posterior sag and categorized them as 3 grades. Quantitative assessment of total anteroposterior (AP) translation of the tibia with a KT-1000 knee arthrometer (MedMetric, San Diego, California) was performed by manual maximum AP drawer test with the knee flexed 70 degrees. The continuity of the PCL was evaluated with sagittal and coronal T1- and T2-weighted MRIs.
RESULTS: Thirty-three (69%) cases exhibited a so-called firm endpoint with a posterior drawer test. These cases showed statistically less total AP translation (mean, 7.0 mm) in KT-1000 evaluation, compared with 15 cases without an endpoint (mean, 11.9 mm). In addition, 36 cases (75%) with continuous low-intensity MRI showed statistically less AP translation (mean 7.6 mm), compared with 12 cases (mean 11.4 mm) with disrupted PCL image.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that a high percentage of acutely injured PCLs are likely to develop somewhat slack but continuous ligament-like tissue, and this continuous PCL-like tissue might function as a posterior restraint of the tibia to certain extent. The elongated but continuous PCL might partly explain the relatively favorable prognosis of this injury.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 11239346     DOI: 10.1053/jars.2001.21540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  8 in total

1.  Recent evolution of cruciate ligament surgery of the knee.

Authors:  Young-Bok Jung
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2012-05-17

2.  Screw fixation of a 4 1/2-year-old PCL avulsion injury.

Authors:  Tobias M Jung; Jürgen Höher; Andreas Weiler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Variations in common operations in athletes and non-Athletes.

Authors:  Amit Joshi; Bibek Basukala; Nagmani Singh; Sunil Panta; Rajiv Sharma; Ishor Pradhan
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-06-14

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee.

Authors:  Thomas W Hash
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.843

5.  Passive Posterior Tibial Subluxation on Routine Knee MRI as a Secondary Sign of PCL Tear.

Authors:  Andrew J Degnan; Catherine Maldjian; Richard J Adam; Christopher D Harner
Journal:  Radiol Res Pract       Date:  2014-12-22

6.  Complex knee injuries treated in acute phase: Long-term results using Ligament Augmentation and Reconstruction System artificial ligament.

Authors:  John Gliatis; Konstantinos Anagnostou; Pantelis Tsoumpos; Evdokia Billis; Maria Papandreou; Spyridon Plessas
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2018-03-18

Review 7.  Optimal management of posterior cruciate ligament injuries: current perspectives.

Authors:  K Donald Shelbourne; Rodney W Benner; Jonathan D Ringenberg; Tinker Gray
Journal:  Orthop Res Rev       Date:  2017-04-05

8.  The MRI posterior drawer test to assess posterior cruciate ligament functionality and knee joint laxity.

Authors:  Lena Marie Wollschläger; Karl Ludger Radke; Justus Schock; Niklas Kotowski; David Latz; Dominika Kanschik; Timm Joachim Filler; Svenja Caspers; Gerald Antoch; Joachim Windolf; Daniel Benjamin Abrar; Sven Nebelung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.