W C Walker1, L A Keyser-Marcus, D X Cifu, M Chaudhri. 1. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical College of Virginia at Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA. wcwalker@hsc.vcu.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To describe outcomes of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients who underwent interdisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation, and to compare them with primary THA patients. DESIGN: Descriptive and case-control study. SETTING: Forty-bed, community-based, freestanding rehabilitation hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty-nine revision THA subjects, gender- and age-matched with 39 primary THA controls. INTERVENTION: Inpatient interdisciplinary rehabilitation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: FIM instrument, length of stay, hospital charges, and disposition location. RESULTS: The average revision THA patient stayed 10.5 days, improved from an admission FIM score of 89 to a discharge FIM score of 110, and incurred a hospital charge of $10,600. Of the revision THA patients, 98% were discharged home, and orthopedic-related complications were uncommon. No significant differences existed between revision and primary THA patients in any outcome measures. A trend toward higher rehabilitation charges ($12,400 vs $9500, p =.07) was found in revision THA patients who wore a hip orthosis. Otherwise, no differences were found in outcome measures based on the type of revision surgery, the presence of weight-bearing restrictions, or the presence of orthopedic complications. CONCLUSIONS: THA patients selected for inpatient rehabilitation have favorable short-term functional outcomes. The type of THA (primary vs revision) is not an independent differentiating factor.
OBJECTIVES: To describe outcomes of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients who underwent interdisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation, and to compare them with primary THA patients. DESIGN: Descriptive and case-control study. SETTING: Forty-bed, community-based, freestanding rehabilitation hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty-nine revision THA subjects, gender- and age-matched with 39 primary THA controls. INTERVENTION: Inpatient interdisciplinary rehabilitation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: FIM instrument, length of stay, hospital charges, and disposition location. RESULTS: The average revision THA patient stayed 10.5 days, improved from an admission FIM score of 89 to a discharge FIM score of 110, and incurred a hospital charge of $10,600. Of the revision THA patients, 98% were discharged home, and orthopedic-related complications were uncommon. No significant differences existed between revision and primary THA patients in any outcome measures. A trend toward higher rehabilitation charges ($12,400 vs $9500, p =.07) was found in revision THA patients who wore a hip orthosis. Otherwise, no differences were found in outcome measures based on the type of revision surgery, the presence of weight-bearing restrictions, or the presence of orthopedic complications. CONCLUSIONS: THA patients selected for inpatient rehabilitation have favorable short-term functional outcomes. The type of THA (primary vs revision) is not an independent differentiating factor.
Authors: Michael Aynardi; Luis Pulido; Javad Parvizi; Peter F Sharkey; Richard H Rothman Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2008-10-10 Impact factor: 4.176