J W Huang1, K Y Hung, C J Yen, K D Wu, T J Tsai. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital. National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) and twin-bag (TB) systems are two major peritoneal dialysis (PD) modalities. Published data comparing the infectious complications of these modalities is limited. Subjects and methods. Ninety-five patients using APD (the APD group) and 117 patients using TB system (the TB group) were recruited. Among them, 35 patients used both modalities. The two groups' clinical characteristics, incidences of infectious complications, and the time intervals to first PD-related infection were compared. RESULTS: Clinical characteristics, incidence of exit-site infection (ESI), and time intervals to first ESI were similar in the TB and APD groups. The incidence of peritonitis in the APD group (1.22 episodes/100 patient-months) was significantly (P < 0.001) lower than that of the TB group (2.28 episodes/100 patient-months). Using the Cox proportional hazard model, APD was found to have a lower risk of peritonitis relative to TB systems, with marginal significance (RR 0.58, P = 0.051). CONCLUSION: APD was found to have a lower peritonitis rate than the TB system. Since reducing the peritonitis rate helps to maintain technical survival during PD, from this viewpoint, APD may be preferred for patients undergoing PD, unless contraindicated.
BACKGROUND: Automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) and twin-bag (TB) systems are two major peritoneal dialysis (PD) modalities. Published data comparing the infectious complications of these modalities is limited. Subjects and methods. Ninety-five patients using APD (the APD group) and 117 patients using TB system (the TB group) were recruited. Among them, 35 patients used both modalities. The two groups' clinical characteristics, incidences of infectious complications, and the time intervals to first PD-related infection were compared. RESULTS: Clinical characteristics, incidence of exit-site infection (ESI), and time intervals to first ESI were similar in the TB and APD groups. The incidence of peritonitis in the APD group (1.22 episodes/100 patient-months) was significantly (P < 0.001) lower than that of the TB group (2.28 episodes/100 patient-months). Using the Cox proportional hazard model, APD was found to have a lower risk of peritonitis relative to TB systems, with marginal significance (RR 0.58, P = 0.051). CONCLUSION:APD was found to have a lower peritonitis rate than the TB system. Since reducing the peritonitis rate helps to maintain technical survival during PD, from this viewpoint, APD may be preferred for patients undergoing PD, unless contraindicated.
Authors: Conal Daly; June D Cody; Izhar Khan; Kannaiyan S Rabindranath; Luke Vale; Sheila A Wallace Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2014-08-13
Authors: Annie-Claire Nadeau-Fredette; David W Johnson; Carmel M Hawley; Elaine M Pascoe; Yeoungjee Cho; Philip A Clayton; Monique Borlace; Sunil V Badve; Kamal Sud; Neil Boudville; Stephen P McDonald Journal: Perit Dial Int Date: 2016-01-13 Impact factor: 1.756
Authors: Patrick G Lan; David W Johnson; Stephen P McDonald; Neil Boudville; Monique Borlace; Sunil V Badve; Kamal Sud; Philip A Clayton Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2014-03-13 Impact factor: 8.237