Literature DB >> 11238966

A role for DNA supercoiling in the regulation of the cytochrome bd oxidase of Escherichia coli.

Keren J Bebbington1, Huw D Williams1.   

Abstract

The cydAB operon of Escherichia coli encodes cytochrome bd, a terminal oxidase in the aerobic respiratory chain. The high oxygen affinity of this oxidase explains its increased synthesis under low-oxygen conditions. Expression of the cydAB operon is controlled by the ArcA/ArcB two-component system and the oxygen-sensing transcriptional regulator Fnr. However, cydAB expression is still induced upon entry into stationary phase or following a shift to anaerobic conditions in a mutant deleted for arcA and fnr [Cotter, P. A. & Gunsalus, R. P. (1992), FEMS Microbiol Lett 91, 31-36]. Indeed, such a mutant contains 60% of the wild-type levels of spectrally detectable cytochrome bd. A possible mechanism to account for this regulation is that changes in negative supercoiling, which occur during a shift to low-oxygen or anaerobic conditions, may contribute to the regulation of the cydAB operon. This paper reports several lines of evidence in support of this idea. Firstly, the expression of cydAB, and the final level of spectrally detectable cytochrome bd, is sensitive to inhibitors of DNA gyrase, the enzyme responsible for introducing negative supercoils into DNA. Both nalidixic acid and novobiocin reduce cydA-lacZ expression in a concentration-dependent manner. Secondly, in a gyrA mutant, defective in DNA gyrase activity, expression of cydAB is reduced to a basal level that is no longer sensitive to the oxygen status. Both gyrase inhibitors and the gyrA mutation reduce cydAB expression in a strain deleted for arcA and fnr, indicating that their effects are not mediated indirectly through ArcA or Fnr, but rather that they are likely to be direct effects on cydAB expression. In conclusion, the authors have shown that changes in DNA supercoiling play a role in the induction of cydAB expression and may provide a general way of increasing cytochrome bd levels in the cell in response to environmental stress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11238966     DOI: 10.1099/00221287-147-3-591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiology        ISSN: 1350-0872            Impact factor:   2.777


  8 in total

Review 1.  DNA supercoiling is a fundamental regulatory principle in the control of bacterial gene expression.

Authors:  Charles J Dorman; Matthew J Dorman
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2016-06-16

Review 2.  DNA supercoiling is a fundamental regulatory principle in the control of bacterial gene expression.

Authors:  Charles J Dorman; Matthew J Dorman
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2016-11-14

3.  Bright mutants of Vibrio fischeri ES114 reveal conditions and regulators that control bioluminescence and expression of the lux operon.

Authors:  Noreen L Lyell; Anne K Dunn; Jeffrey L Bose; Eric V Stabb
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Dissection of the Bradyrhizobium japonicum NifA+sigma54 regulon, and identification of a ferredoxin gene (fdxN) for symbiotic nitrogen fixation.

Authors:  Felix Hauser; Gabriella Pessi; Markus Friberg; Christoph Weber; Nicola Rusca; Andrea Lindemann; Hans-Martin Fischer; Hauke Hennecke
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 3.291

5.  Plasmid DNA supercoiling and survival in long-term cultures of Escherichia coli: role of NaCl.

Authors:  Annie Conter
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Genomic transcriptional response to loss of chromosomal supercoiling in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Brian J Peter; Javier Arsuaga; Adam M Breier; Arkady B Khodursky; Patrick O Brown; Nicholas R Cozzarelli
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 13.583

Review 7.  DNA supercoiling and transcription in bacteria: a two-way street.

Authors:  Charles J Dorman
Journal:  BMC Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2019-07-18

8.  Transcriptomic and metabolomic profiling of Zymomonas mobilis during aerobic and anaerobic fermentations.

Authors:  Shihui Yang; Timothy J Tschaplinski; Nancy L Engle; Sue L Carroll; Stanton L Martin; Brian H Davison; Anthony V Palumbo; Miguel Rodriguez; Steven D Brown
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 3.969

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.