Literature DB >> 11237985

Children with macrocrania: clinical and imaging predictors of disorders requiring surgery.

L S Medina1, K Frawley, D Zurakowski, D Buttros, A J DeGrauw, K R Crone.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Macrocrania is a common pediatric clinical condition affecting up to 5% of the population. The purpose of this study was to determine clinical and imaging predictors that are useful in the differentiation of disorders requiring surgical treatment from those that can be treated medically in children with macrocrania.
METHODS: In a 3-year 7-month retrospective study, 88 patients (median age, 8 months; interquartile range, 5--13 months) with macrocrania and no known underlying neurologic disorder underwent imaging of the brain (sonography, n = 36; CT, n = 31; MR imaging = 21). The study was conducted in a pediatric tertiary care referral center. Clinical and imaging data were correlated to final diagnosis by means of logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curves.
RESULTS: Sixteen (18%) of the patients had disorders requiring surgery: communicating hydrocephalus, n = 7; noncommunicating hydrocephalus, n = 3; hemorrhagic subdural collections, n = 3; neoplasm, n = 1; encysted cavum septi pellucidi, n = 1; and vein of Galen malformation, n = 1. Clinical predictors of disorders requiring surgery included vomiting (P =.007), labor instrumentation (P =.026), developmental delay (P =.008), and abnormal neurologic findings (P =.028). Imaging predictors of disorders requiring surgery included a focal space-occupying lesion (P <.0001) and moderate-to-severe ventriculomegaly (P <.0001). The diagnostic sensitivity of the combination of independent clinical and imaging predictors was higher than that of independent clinical predictors alone, being 100% (95% confidence interval = 96.9%, 100%) and 93.8% (95% confidence interval = 88.7%, 98.8%), respectively. A trend indicated that the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for clinical plus imaging findings (0.95) was greater than that for clinical findings alone (0.85) (P =.09). An increase in the number of clinical and imaging predictors was highly correlated with an increased risk of a disorder requiring surgery (P <.0001).
CONCLUSION: Baseline neuroimaging is indicated for children with macrocrania because the combination of clinical and imaging predictors has the best diagnostic performance in determining the need for surgical versus nonsurgical management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11237985      PMCID: PMC7976845     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  20 in total

1.  Basic principles of ROC analysis.

Authors:  C E Metz
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 4.446

2.  Head injury in very young children: mechanisms, injury types, and ophthalmologic findings in 100 hospitalized patients younger than 2 years of age.

Authors:  A C Duhaime; A J Alario; W J Lewander; L Schut; L N Sutton; T S Seidl; S Nudelman; D Budenz; R Hertle; W Tsiaras
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  The value of head ultrasound in infants with macrocephaly.

Authors:  R Smith; J C Leonidas; J Maytal
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1998-03

4.  Patterns of presentation in brain tumors in the United States.

Authors:  A Zaki; N Natarajan; C J Mettlin
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  A review of goodness of fit statistics for use in the development of logistic regression models.

Authors:  S Lemeshow; D W Hosmer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  External obstructive hydrocephalus: a study of clinical and developmental aspects in ten children.

Authors:  E A Neveling; R C Truex
Journal:  J Neurosurg Nurs       Date:  1983-08

7.  The value of computed tomography in the evaluation of the enlarged head.

Authors:  D Kingsley; B E Kendall
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1978-04-27       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  The subarachnoid spaces in children: normal variations in size.

Authors:  P K Kleinman; J L Zito; R I Davidson; V Raptopoulos
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Physical growth: National Center for Health Statistics percentiles.

Authors:  P V Hamill; T A Drizd; C L Johnson; R B Reed; A F Roche; W M Moore
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 7.045

10.  Developmental prognosis for infants with benign enlargement of the subarachnoid spaces.

Authors:  R E Nickel; J S Gallenstein
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 5.449

View more
  10 in total

1.  Diffusion tensor imaging findings in young children with benign external hydrocephalus differ from the normal population.

Authors:  M Sun; W Yuan; D A Hertzler; A Cancelliere; M Altaye; F T Mangano
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Evidence that congenital hydrocephalus is a precursor to idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus in only a subset of patients.

Authors:  Robin K Wilson; Michael A Williams
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 3.  Macrocephaly and subdural collections.

Authors:  Marguerite M Caré
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-05-17

4.  Asymptomatic macrocephaly: to scan or not to scan.

Authors:  Claire N Thomas; Amy B Kolbe; Larry A Binkovitz; Jennifer S McDonald; Kristen B Thomas
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-01-05

5.  Prevalence of subdural collections in children with macrocrania.

Authors:  M V Greiner; T J Richards; M M Care; J L Leach
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 6.  Benign external hydrocephalus: a review, with emphasis on management.

Authors:  Sverre Morten Zahl; Arild Egge; Eirik Helseth; Knut Wester
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 3.042

7.  Epidemiology of subdural haemorrhage during infancy: A population-based register study.

Authors:  Ulf Högberg; Jacob Andersson; Waney Squier; Göran Högberg; Vineta Fellman; Ingemar Thiblin; Knut Wester
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Diagnostic Approach to Macrocephaly in Children.

Authors:  Andrea Accogli; Ana Filipa Geraldo; Gianluca Piccolo; Antonella Riva; Marcello Scala; Ganna Balagura; Vincenzo Salpietro; Francesca Madia; Mohamad Maghnie; Federico Zara; Pasquale Striano; Domenico Tortora; Mariasavina Severino; Valeria Capra
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 3.418

9.  A study on causes and types of abnormal increase in infants' head circumference in kashan/iran.

Authors:  Ahmad Talebian; Babak Soltani; Alireza Moravveji; Ladan Salamati; Majid Davami
Journal:  Iran J Child Neurol       Date:  2013

10.  Is external hydrocephalus a possible differential diagnosis when child abuse is suspected?

Authors:  Joseph Scheller; Knut Wester
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 2.216

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.