J L Sievenpiper1, D J Jenkins, R G Josse, L A Leiter, V Vuksan. 1. Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto and the Clinical Nutrition and Risk Factor Modification Centre, and the Division of Metabolism and Endocrinology, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Skinfold-thickness measurements are considered to have limited clinical utility. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether skinfold-thickness measurements may be a useful adjunct to conventional anthropometric assessments in predicting glucose and insulin regulation, we studied responses to replicate 75-g oral-glucose-tolerance tests (OGTTs) and performed simple anthropometry in a cross section of subjects. DESIGN: Thirty-five subjects completed the study: 11 lean [mean (+/-SEM) age: 33 +/- 3.2 y; body mass index (BMI; in kg/m(2)): 24.1 +/- 0.8; and percentage body fat (%BF): 11.5 +/- 1.5%], 12 normal-weight (age: 33 +/- 2.9 y; BMI: 23.9 +/- 0.7; and %BF: 24.3.5 +/- 1.3%), and 12 obese (age: 41 +/- 4.5 y; BMI: 34.5 +/- 1.7; and %BF: 34.2 +/- 1.5%) individuals. The lean and normal-weight groups were selected to have similar BMIs but different %BFs. We measured the participants' heights, weights, %BFs, waist circumferences, hip circumferences, and truncal and peripheral skinfold thicknesses. Subjects received nine 75-g OGTTs and blood samples were collected at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min. Mean plasma glucose and insulin values were used to calculate the insulin sensitivity index. RESULTS: The obese group had higher plasma glucose concentrations and areas under the curve (AUCs) than did the normal-weight or lean group and higher plasma insulin concentrations and AUCs than did the lean group (P < 0.05). Stepwise multiple regression, with adjustment for demographic and anthropometric measurements, identified the following predictors: waist circumference, peripheral skinfold thickness, and BMI for fasting plasma glucose (partial R(2) = 0.20, 0.13, and 0.13, P < 0.05); waist circumference and truncal skinfold thickness for plasma glucose AUC (partial R(2) = 0.20 and 0.13, P < 0.05); age, waist-to-hip ratio, and peripheral skinfold thickness for fasting plasma insulin (partial R(2) = 0.26, 0.22, and 0.15, P < 0.05); truncal skinfold thickness for plasma insulin AUC (partial R(2) = 0.41, P < 0.001); and peripheral skinfold thickness for both 2-h plasma glucose (partial R(2) = 0.59, P < 0.001) and the insulin sensitivity index (partial R(2) = 0.49, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Skinfold-thickness measurements may complement other established measurements for predicting abnormal glucose and insulin regulation.
BACKGROUND: Skinfold-thickness measurements are considered to have limited clinical utility. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether skinfold-thickness measurements may be a useful adjunct to conventional anthropometric assessments in predicting glucose and insulin regulation, we studied responses to replicate 75-g oral-glucose-tolerance tests (OGTTs) and performed simple anthropometry in a cross section of subjects. DESIGN: Thirty-five subjects completed the study: 11 lean [mean (+/-SEM) age: 33 +/- 3.2 y; body mass index (BMI; in kg/m(2)): 24.1 +/- 0.8; and percentage body fat (%BF): 11.5 +/- 1.5%], 12 normal-weight (age: 33 +/- 2.9 y; BMI: 23.9 +/- 0.7; and %BF: 24.3.5 +/- 1.3%), and 12 obese (age: 41 +/- 4.5 y; BMI: 34.5 +/- 1.7; and %BF: 34.2 +/- 1.5%) individuals. The lean and normal-weight groups were selected to have similar BMIs but different %BFs. We measured the participants' heights, weights, %BFs, waist circumferences, hip circumferences, and truncal and peripheral skinfold thicknesses. Subjects received nine 75-g OGTTs and blood samples were collected at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min. Mean plasma glucose and insulin values were used to calculate the insulin sensitivity index. RESULTS: The obese group had higher plasma glucose concentrations and areas under the curve (AUCs) than did the normal-weight or lean group and higher plasma insulin concentrations and AUCs than did the lean group (P < 0.05). Stepwise multiple regression, with adjustment for demographic and anthropometric measurements, identified the following predictors: waist circumference, peripheral skinfold thickness, and BMI for fasting plasma glucose (partial R(2) = 0.20, 0.13, and 0.13, P < 0.05); waist circumference and truncal skinfold thickness for plasma glucose AUC (partial R(2) = 0.20 and 0.13, P < 0.05); age, waist-to-hip ratio, and peripheral skinfold thickness for fasting plasma insulin (partial R(2) = 0.26, 0.22, and 0.15, P < 0.05); truncal skinfold thickness for plasma insulin AUC (partial R(2) = 0.41, P < 0.001); and peripheral skinfold thickness for both 2-h plasma glucose (partial R(2) = 0.59, P < 0.001) and the insulin sensitivity index (partial R(2) = 0.49, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Skinfold-thickness measurements may complement other established measurements for predicting abnormal glucose and insulin regulation.
Authors: Noel T Mueller; Mark A Pereira; Adriana Buitrago-Lopez; Diana C Rodríguez; Alvaro E Duran; Alvaro J Ruiz; Christian F Rueda-Clausen; Cristina Villa-Roel Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2012-08-24 Impact factor: 4.022