Literature DB >> 11237542

Trends in cardiogenic shock: report from the SHOCK Study. The SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK?

L Carnendran1, R Abboud, L A Sleeper, R Gurunathan, J G Webb, V Menon, V Dzavik, T Cocke, J S Hochman .   

Abstract

AIMS: We analysed time trends in patient characteristics, management, and outcomes of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction in the international, prospective SHOCK Trial Registry and pre-study Registry.
BACKGROUND: Despite therapeutic advances in its management, the incidence and high mortality of this complication has remained unchanged for decades. However, in recent years mortality was reported to decrease in one community concomitant with increasing use of revascularization.
METHODS: Thirty-six centres registered 1380 patients with suspected cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction from January 1992 to August 1997. Patient and myocardial infarction characteristics, haemodynamics, medications, procedure use, and vital status at discharge were recorded.
RESULTS: In all, 79% of patients had shock due to predominant pump failure (non-mechanical aetiology). The aetiology, patient profile, and clinical characteristics of cardiogenic shock did not differ over time, except for increases in the incidence of prior bypass surgery (P=0.054) and transfers to tertiary centres (P=0.008). In all, 44% underwent revascularization (n=485), with angioplasty performed more often than bypass surgery (69% vs 31%). The revascularization rate increased over time (P=0.006) with a significant decrease in the time to revascularization (P=0.033). The use of Swan-Ganz catheterization decreased over time (P=0.018), as did the mean length of hospitalization (P=0.034). Overall in-hospital mortality was high (63%) but decreased over time in all patients (P=0.004) and those with pump failure (P=0.018). Mortality was lower for patients who underwent revascularization compared to those who were not revascularized (41% vs 79%, P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction is associated with a high mortality rate, but mortality decreased significantly from 1992 to 1997. This partly reflects the greater use of revascularization, which was associated with better outcomes. The reported international trend towards shorter admissions for myocardial infarction was also observed in this cohort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11237542     DOI: 10.1053/euhj.2000.2312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  13 in total

Review 1.  Management of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Venu Menon; Judith S Hochman
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Changing outcomes of coronary revascularization in British Columbia, 1995-2001.

Authors:  Gordon E Pate; Min Gao; Lillian Ding; Ronald G Carere; Frank O Tyers; Robert I Hayden
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.223

3.  Management of unstable arrhythmias in cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Abdulfattah Saidi; Nazem Akoum; Feras Bader
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2011-08

4.  Long-Term Survival after Invasive or Conservative Strategy in Elderly Patients with non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Kristin Marie Kvakkestad; Jon Michael Gran; Jan Eritsland; Charlotte Holst Hansen; Eigil Fossum; Geir Øystein Andersen; Sigrun Halvorsen
Journal:  Cardiology       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 1.869

5.  In-Hospital Outcome of Patients with Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results from Royal Hospital Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry, Oman.

Authors:  Mohammad S Islam; Prashanth Panduranga; Mohammed Al-Mukhaini; Abdullah Al-Riyami; Mohammad El-Deeb; Said Abdul Rahman; Mohammed B Al-Riyami
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2016-01

Review 6.  Current Concepts and New Trends in the Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Theodora Benedek; Dan Dobreanu
Journal:  J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures)       Date:  2015-03-01

7.  Goal directed therapy: how long can we wait?

Authors:  Anthony C Gordon; James A Russell
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  A review of cardiogenic shock in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  L Khalid; S H Dhakam
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2008-02

Review 9.  Thoratec CentriMag for temporary treatment of refractory cardiogenic shock or severe cardiopulmonary insufficiency: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Oleg Borisenko; Gillian Wylie; John Payne; Staffan Bjessmo; Jon Smith; Nizar Yonan; Richard Firmin
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 10.  Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock - what every interventional cardiologist should know.

Authors:  Lukasz Pyka; Damian Pres; Roman Przybylski; Jerzy Pacholewicz; Lech Poloński; Marian Zembala; Mariusz Gąsior
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 1.426

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.