Literature DB >> 1123690

Visibility of low-spatial-frequency sine-wave targets: Dependence on number of cycles.

R L Savoy, J J McCann.   

Abstract

The number of cycles in a low-frequency sinusoidal display is a crucial variable in determining the visibility of the display. In particular, the threshold contrast is essentially independent of spatial frequency for these displays. We have extended the above experiments, using more cycles and a variety of targets and observer tasks. The results confirm previous findings; they also show that the type of target or task has little influence. For low-frequency sinusoids that contain up to about 3 cycles, the threshold contrast is determined by the number of cycles. For high-number-of-cycles targets with spatial frequencies above 6-10 cycles per degree, visibility is predominantly dependent on the spatial frequency. The results suggest that the low-frequency decrease in reported MTF's is due to the decrease of the number of cycles used in determining them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1123690     DOI: 10.1364/josa.65.000343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am        ISSN: 0030-3941


  12 in total

1.  Senescent changes in photopic spatial summation.

Authors:  Maka Malania; Frédéric Devinck; Kenneth Knoblauch; Peter B Delahunt; Joseph L Hardy; John S Werner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Simulated bipolar cells in fovea of human retina. V. Use of Fourier analysis to determine resolution.

Authors:  R Siminoff
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  Comparing enfant and PowerDiva sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP) acuity estimates.

Authors:  William H Ridder; Bradley S Waite; Timothy F Melton
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Visual resolution, contrast sensitivity, and the cortical magnification factor.

Authors:  V Virsu; J Rovamo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Microprocessor-controlled contrast sensitivity measurements.

Authors:  C J Keemink; G J van der Wildt; J B van Deursen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  The contrast sensitivity of human colour vision to red-green and blue-yellow chromatic gratings.

Authors:  K T Mullen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Spatial contrast sensitivity of birds.

Authors:  Mimi M Ghim; William Hodos
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-01-11       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Effect of stimulus field size and localization on the binocular pattern reversal visual evoked response.

Authors:  O Katsumi; T Hirose; T Tanino
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Contrast sensitivity in natural scenes depends on edge as well as spatial frequency structure.

Authors:  Peter J Bex; Samuel G Solomon; Steven C Dakin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Spatial contrast sensitivity in benign intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  C Bulens; J D Meerwaldt; P J Koudstaal; G J Van der Wildt
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 10.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.