Literature DB >> 11236113

A randomised controlled trial of antibiotic prophylaxis in elective caesarean delivery.

J S Bagratee1, J Moodley, I Kleinschmidt, W Zawilski.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether prophylactic antibiotic administration using cefoxitin at the time of elective caesarean section significantly reduces infectious morbidity.
SETTING: A tertiary teaching hospital in a large urban city in South Africa. PARTICIPANTS: Women undergoing elective caesarean section.
DESIGN: A prospective, double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial.
METHODS: Four hundred and eighty women undergoing elective caesarean section had cefoxitin or placebo administration after umbilical cord clamping. Postpartum complications including febrile morbidity, wound infection, endometritis, urinary tract infection, pneumonia and transient postpartum fever were recorded, as were the duration of hospital stay and the need for therapeutic antibiotics.
RESULTS: Wound infection was the most common complication occurring in 13.3% and 12.5% of women in the placebo and cefoxitin groups, respectively. Prophylactic antibiotics did not decrease febrile morbidity, wound infection, endometritis, urinary tract infection and pneumonia. Women who received cefoxitin stayed on average a day less in hospital than those who received placebo (6.9 vs 7.8 days, risk difference 0.94 CI 1.57 - 0.31 days). Eleven women (4.6%) in the placebo group and eight (3.4%) in the cefoxitin group had microbiological evidence of wound infection. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen (43%) isolated. Similar proportions in both groups (6.3% placebo and 5.1% cefoxitin) required a course of therapeutic antibiotics.
CONCLUSION: Antibiotic prophylaxis with cefoxitin in elective caesarean section did not reduce post-operative infectious morbidity in this double-blind randomised placebo controlled trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11236113     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00042.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  7 in total

Review 1.  Current debate on the use of antibiotic prophylaxis for caesarean section.

Authors:  R F Lamont; J D Sobel; J P Kusanovic; E Vaisbuch; S Mazaki-Tovi; S K Kim; N Uldbjerg; R Romero
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 2.  Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section.

Authors:  Fiona M Smaill; Rosalie M Grivell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-10-28

Review 3.  Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section.

Authors:  Fiona M Smaill; Gillian Ml Gyte
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

Review 4.  Interventional studies for preventing surgical site infections in sub-Saharan Africa - A systematic review.

Authors:  Alexander M Aiken; David M Karuri; Anthony K Wanyoro; Jana Macleod
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2012-04-14       Impact factor: 6.071

5.  Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis for nonlaboring cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Mara J Dinsmoor; Sharon Gilbert; Mark B Landon; Dwight J Rouse; Catherine Y Spong; Michael W Varner; Steve N Caritis; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Mary J O'Sullivan; Baha M Sibai; Oded Langer
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Prophylactic ceftizoxime for elective cesarean delivery at Soba Hospital, Sudan.

Authors:  Bashier Osman; Amna Abbas; Mohamed A Ahmed; Magid S Abubaker; Ishag Adam
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2013-02-08

7.  Assessment of clinical outcomes and prescribing behavior among inpatients with severe preeclampsia and eclampsia: an Indian experience.

Authors:  Shefalika Kumar; Dipika Bansal; Debasish Hota; Madhu Jain; Pawan Singh; B L Pandey
Journal:  Indian J Pharmacol       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.200

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.