PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred patients admitted to a rheumatology department (mean age, 49.2+/-15.5 years) and 100 nurses working in the same teaching hospital (mean age, 36+/-8.6 years) completed a questionnaire on the placebo effect in the treatment of pain. RESULTS: The patients believed that the percentages of subjects who responded occasionally or consistently to a placebo were 32% (+/- 22%) and 21% (+/- 17%), respectively. The figures given by the nurses were only slightly higher: 42% (+/- 23%) and 23% (+/- 17%), respectively. Only 27% of the patients and 58% of the nurses knew that pain could resolve completely under placebo therapy. The mean percentage improvement induced by placebo therapy as compared to the study analgesic was estimated at 21% (+/- 17%) by the patients and 30% (+/- 18%) by the nurses. Only 23% of patients and 24% of nurses knew about nocebo effects. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that during double-blind placebo-controlled trials three-quarters of the placebo arm patients who experience a marked improvement or a nocebo effect may believe they received the active drug. This is likely to reduce the difference between the placebo and active drug groups. Furthermore, most patients and nurses have a negative perception of placebo therapy. It may be useful to include a brief description of placebo and nocebo effects into the patient's information and informed consent documents used in double-blind placebo-controlled trials.
RCT Entities:
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred patients admitted to a rheumatology department (mean age, 49.2+/-15.5 years) and 100 nurses working in the same teaching hospital (mean age, 36+/-8.6 years) completed a questionnaire on the placebo effect in the treatment of pain. RESULTS: The patients believed that the percentages of subjects who responded occasionally or consistently to a placebo were 32% (+/- 22%) and 21% (+/- 17%), respectively. The figures given by the nurses were only slightly higher: 42% (+/- 23%) and 23% (+/- 17%), respectively. Only 27% of the patients and 58% of the nurses knew that pain could resolve completely under placebo therapy. The mean percentage improvement induced by placebo therapy as compared to the study analgesic was estimated at 21% (+/- 17%) by the patients and 30% (+/- 18%) by the nurses. Only 23% of patients and 24% of nurses knew about nocebo effects. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that during double-blind placebo-controlled trials three-quarters of the placebo arm patients who experience a marked improvement or a nocebo effect may believe they received the active drug. This is likely to reduce the difference between the placebo and active drug groups. Furthermore, most patients and nurses have a negative perception of placebo therapy. It may be useful to include a brief description of placebo and nocebo effects into the patient's information and informed consent documents used in double-blind placebo-controlled trials.
Authors: John Hughes; Maddy Greville-Harris; Cynthia A Graham; George Lewith; Peter White; Felicity L Bishop Journal: J Med Ethics Date: 2017-06-29 Impact factor: 2.903
Authors: Sara Chandros Hull; Luana Colloca; Andrew Avins; Nancy P Gordon; Carol P Somkin; Ted J Kaptchuk; Franklin G Miller Journal: BMJ Date: 2013-07-02
Authors: Felicity L Bishop; Maddy Greville-Harris; Jennifer Bostock; Amy Din; Cynthia A Graham; George Lewith; Christina Liossi; Tim O'Riordan; Peter White; Lucy Yardley Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2019-01-17 Impact factor: 5.428