Literature DB >> 11235232

Comparison of field performance of the Andersen N6 single stage and the SAS sampler for airborne fungal propagules.

P Bellin1, J Schillinger.   

Abstract

Comparisons of two common bioaerosol samplers were made after sampling and enumeration of airborne fungal propagules in several office structures on a university campus in Southern California. Data collected on five occasions throughout the year showed that a Surface Air Systems (SAS) high flow portable sampler recovered consistently lower levels of colony forming units (cfu) than an Andersen N6 single stage impactor. There was no difference statistically between the samplers when concentrations of Cladosporium were compared. Compared to the Andersen N6, the SAS sampler recovered about half the number of cfu for three other fungal categories, i.e. non-sporulating species, Aspergillus and Penicillium and others. Differences in sampler efficiencies are discussed in terms of effective particle diameters. Counts of culturable airborne fungal spores obtained with the SAS sampler should be interpreted with caution when genera other than Cladosporium predominate.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11235232     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0668.2001.011001065.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indoor Air        ISSN: 0905-6947            Impact factor:   5.770


  1 in total

1.  Identification and seasonal distribution of airborne fungi in three horse stables in Italy.

Authors:  Simona Nardoni; Francesca Mancianti; Micaela Sgorbini; Fabrizio Taccini; Michele Corazza
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.574

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.