Incidence and management of esophageal stricture formation, ulcer bleeding, perforation, and massive hematoma formation from sclerotherapy versus band ligation.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the incidence and endoscopic management of esophageal stricture formation, significant ulcer bleeding, massive esophageal hematoma, and perforation resulting from endoscopic band ligation or sclerotherapy of esophageal varices.
METHODS: Consecutive esophagogastroduodenoscopies in which band ligation or sclerotherapy was performed for acute or obliterative therapy were entered into a computerized endoscopy database during a 7-yr period. Patients were excluded if they died within 72 h of treatment session from complications unrelated to the procedure. Sclerotherapy was performed using a 25-gauge needle with 1.5% sodium tetradecyl sulfate and banding was primarily performed with a Wilson-Cook 6 or 10 shooter. Complications were assessed at scheduled endoscopy and outpatient clinic visits, review of quality assurance data tallied on a monthly basis, and patient records.
RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-one cases of sclerotherapy were performed in 59 patients compared to 110 cases of band ligation in 52 patients. Five patients were excluded because of death within 72 h of the procedure. The incidence of complications from sclerotherapy:banding on a per patient basis included: esophageal stricture formation 25.6%:1.9%, ulcer bleed 25.4%:5.7%, esophageal perforation 2.2%:0%, and massive esophageal hematoma 1.6%:0%. A significant difference in complications between sclerotherapy and band ligation was noted for both stricture formation (p < 0.0005) and ulcer bleeding (p < 0.0001). The majority of ulcer bleeds required no therapeutic intervention, whereas stricture formation required multiple dilation sessions.
CONCLUSIONS: Band ligation has a significantly lower incidence of stricture formation and ulcer bleeding compared to sclerotherapy. The majority of complications can be managed with endoscopic interventions.