Literature DB >> 11232606

Distribution of patients' paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmia episodes: implications for detection of treatment efficacy.

W F Kaemmerer1, M S Rose, R Mehra.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Clinical trials of treatments for paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmia (pAT) often compare different treatment groups using the time to first episode recurrence. This approach assumes that the time to the first recurrence is representative of all times between successive episodes in a given patient. We subjected this assumption to an empiric test. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Records of pAT onsets from a chronologic series of 134 patients with dual chamber implantable defibrillators were analyzed; 14 had experienced >10 pAT episodes, which is sufficient for meaningful statistical modeling of the time intervals between episodes. Episodes were independent and randomly distributed in 9 of 14 patients, but a fit of the data to an exponential distribution, required by the stated assumption, was rejected in 13 of 14. In contrast, a Weibull distribution yielded an adequate goodness of fit in 5 of the 9 cases with independent and randomly distributed data. Monte Carlo methods were used to determine the impact of violations of the exponential distribution assumption on clinical trials using time from cardioversion to first episode recurrence as the dependent measure. In a parallel groups design, substantial loss of power occurs with sample sizes <500 patients per group. In a cross-over design, there is insufficient power to detect a 30% reduction in episode frequency even with 300 patients.
CONCLUSION: Clinical trials that rely on time to first episode recurrence may be considerably less able to detect efficacious treatments than may have been supposed. Analysis of multiple episode onsets recorded over time should be used to avoid this pitfall.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11232606     DOI: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2001.00121.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  5 in total

Review 1.  The results of pacing trials for the prevention and termination of atrial tachyarrhythmias: is there any evidence of therapeutic breakthrough?

Authors:  Irina Savelieva; A John Camm
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  How often should we monitor for reliable detection of atrial fibrillation recurrence? Efficiency considerations and implications for study design.

Authors:  Efstratios I Charitos; Paul D Ziegler; Ulrich Stierle; Derek R Robinson; Bernhard Graf; Hans-Hinrich Sievers; Thorsten Hanke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, multicenter study to assess the effects of dronedarone 400 mg twice daily for 12 weeks on atrial fibrillation burden in subjects with permanent pacemakers.

Authors:  Michael D Ezekowitz; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; John P DiMarco; Karoly Kaszala; Alexander Boddy; Gregory P Geba; Gregory Geba P; Andrew Koren
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 4.  The role of pacing in rhythm control and management of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  John Silberbauer; Neil Sulke
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 1.759

5.  A Stochastic Individual-Based Model of the Progression of Atrial Fibrillation in Individuals and Populations.

Authors:  Eugene T Y Chang; Yen Ting Lin; Tobias Galla; Richard H Clayton; Julie Eatock
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.