BACKGROUND: Some clinical studies demonstrate that kidney grafts with prolonged cold ischemia experience early acute rejection more often than those with minimal ischemia. The mechanism, however, is putative. Therefore, the aim of this study was to unravel the impact of ischemia on the immune response in rat kidney allografts compared with that in isografts. METHODS: To induce ischemic injury, donor kidneys were preserved for 24 hours in 4 degrees C University of Wisconsin solution before transplantation. No immunosuppression was administered. The histomorphology according to the BANFF criteria for acute rejection and infiltrating cells were assessed at days 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 post-transplantation. RESULTS: In allografts, exposure of the kidney to ischemia led to a significantly earlier onset of interstitial cell infiltration and tubulitis compared with nonischemic allografts. The BANFF score of interstitial cell infiltration was 1 +/- 0 vs. 0.25 +/- 0.29 at day 3 and 2 +/- 0 vs. 1.25 +/- 0.25 at day 4. In contrast, in isografts, the effect of ischemia on the histology was not significant. From day 6, the histologic differences between ischemic and nonischemic grafts disappeared. Ischemia led to a more intense expression of P-selectin (day 1), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1; day 2), and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II on endothelium and proximal tubular cells (day 2) in both allografts and isografts. Concurrently with the up-regulated ICAM-1 and MHC expression, significantly more CD4(+) cells and macrophages infiltrated the ischemic allografts at days 2 and 3 and the ischemic isografts at day 4. Importantly, the influx of these cells after ischemia was significantly greater in allografts than in isografts. CONCLUSIONS: Cold ischemia augments allogeneic-mediated cell infiltration in rat kidney allografts. The earlier onset of acute rejection in 24-hour cold preserved allografts may be prevented by better preservation or treatment using tailored immunosuppression.
BACKGROUND: Some clinical studies demonstrate that kidney grafts with prolonged cold ischemia experience early acute rejection more often than those with minimal ischemia. The mechanism, however, is putative. Therefore, the aim of this study was to unravel the impact of ischemia on the immune response in rat kidney allografts compared with that in isografts. METHODS: To induce ischemic injury, donor kidneys were preserved for 24 hours in 4 degrees C University of Wisconsin solution before transplantation. No immunosuppression was administered. The histomorphology according to the BANFF criteria for acute rejection and infiltrating cells were assessed at days 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 post-transplantation. RESULTS: In allografts, exposure of the kidney to ischemia led to a significantly earlier onset of interstitial cell infiltration and tubulitis compared with nonischemic allografts. The BANFF score of interstitial cell infiltration was 1 +/- 0 vs. 0.25 +/- 0.29 at day 3 and 2 +/- 0 vs. 1.25 +/- 0.25 at day 4. In contrast, in isografts, the effect of ischemia on the histology was not significant. From day 6, the histologic differences between ischemic and nonischemic grafts disappeared. Ischemia led to a more intense expression of P-selectin (day 1), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1; day 2), and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II on endothelium and proximal tubular cells (day 2) in both allografts and isografts. Concurrently with the up-regulated ICAM-1 and MHC expression, significantly more CD4(+) cells and macrophages infiltrated the ischemic allografts at days 2 and 3 and the ischemic isografts at day 4. Importantly, the influx of these cells after ischemia was significantly greater in allografts than in isografts. CONCLUSIONS: Cold ischemia augments allogeneic-mediated cell infiltration in rat kidney allografts. The earlier onset of acute rejection in 24-hour cold preserved allografts may be prevented by better preservation or treatment using tailored immunosuppression.
Authors: Yingyos Avihingsanon; Naili Ma; Martha Pavlakis; W James Chon; Marc E Uknis; Anthony P Monaco; Christiane Ferran; Isaac Stillman; Asher D Schachter; Christina Mottley; Xin Xiao Zheng; Terry B Strom Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2005-05-11 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: F Cicora; J Roberti; D Vasquez; D Guerrieri; N Lausada; P Cicora; G Palti; E Chuluyan; P Gonzalez; P Stringa; C Raimondi Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Ralf M Lösel; Ulf Schnetzke; Paul T Brinkkoetter; Hui Song; Grietje Beck; Peter Schnuelle; Simone Höger; Martin Wehling; Benito A Yard Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-03-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Immaculada Herrero-Fresneda; Joan Torras; Josep M Cruzado; Enric Condom; August Vidal; Marta Riera; Nuria Lloberas; Jeroni Alsina; Josep M Grinyo Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Kikumi S Ozaki; Shoko Kimura; Michael A Nalesnik; Rita M Sico; Matthew Zhang; Shinya Ueki; Mark A Ross; Donna B Stolz; Noriko Murase Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2012-01-25 Impact factor: 10.612