Literature DB >> 11230900

Cattle vocalizations are associated with handling and equipment problems at beef slaughter plants.

T Grandin1.   

Abstract

Vocalization of cattle in commercial slaughter plants is associated with observable aversive events such as prodding with electric prods, slipping in the stunning box, missed stuns, sharp edges on equipment or excessive pressure form a restraint device. A total of 5806 cattle were observed during handling and stunning in 48 commercial slaughter plants in the United States, Canada and Australia during the calendar year of 1999. Each animal was scored as either a vocalizer or a non-vocalizer. In 20 plants (42%), 0-1% of the cattle vocalized, in 12 plants (25%) 2-3% vocalized, in 12 plants (25%) 4-10% vocalized and in four plants (8%) more than 10% vocalized. In three plants repeated use of an electric prod on 95% or more of the cattle that balked and refused to move was associated with vocalization percentages of 17, 16 and 12%. In five plants, the percentage of cattle that vocalized was reduced by making modifications to plant equipment. Reducing the voltage on a rheostat controlled electric prod reduced the vocalization percentage from 7 to 2% in the first plant. In three other plants, the incidence of cattle backing up and balking was reduced by illuminating a dark entrance or adding a false floor to a conveyor restrainer. A false floor eliminates the visual cliff effect. The percentage of cattle that vocalized was reduced from 8 to 0%, 9 to 0% and 17 to 2%. Since balking was reduced, electric prod use was also reduced. In the fifth plant, reduction of the pressure exerted by a neck restraint reduced the percentage of cattle that vocalized from 23 to 0%. In the five plants where modifications were made, a total of 379 cattle were observed prior to equipment modifications and 342 after modification. The mean percentage of cattle that vocalized was 12.8% before the modifications and 0.8% after the modifications (P<0.001). Vocalization scoring can be used to identify handling and equipment problems that may compromise animal welfare.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 11230900     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1591(00)00179-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Anim Behav Sci        ISSN: 0168-1591            Impact factor:   2.448


  10 in total

1.  Transport Fitness of Cull Sows and Boars: A Comparison of Different Guidelines on Fitness for Transport.

Authors:  Temple Grandin
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  Farm to abattoir conditions, animal factors and their subsequent effects on cattle behavioural responses and beef quality - A review.

Authors:  Yonela Zifikile Njisane; Voster Muchenje
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 2.509

3.  Scientific report on the effects of farming systems on dairy cow welfare and disease.

Authors: 
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2009-07-09

Review 4.  Pain at the Slaughterhouse in Ruminants with a Focus on the Neurobiology of Sensitisation.

Authors:  Daniel Mota-Rojas; Fabio Napolitano; Ana Strappini; Agustín Orihuela; Marcelo Daniel Ghezzi; Ismael Hernández-Ávalos; Patricia Mora-Medina; Alexandra L Whittaker
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 5.  How Farm Animals React and Perceive Stressful Situations Such As Handling, Restraint, and Transport.

Authors:  Temple Grandin; Chelsey Shivley
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 6.  Addressing the Challenges of Conducting Observational Studies in Sheep Abattoirs.

Authors:  Elyssa Payne; Melissa Starling; Paul McGreevy
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 7.  Evaluation of the welfare of cattle housed in outdoor feedlot pens.

Authors:  Temple Grandin
Journal:  Vet Anim Sci       Date:  2016-11-30

8.  Swine welfare at slaughterhouses in Valle de Aburrá (Colombia).

Authors:  Natalia Uribe Corrales; Juan F Naranjo Ramírez; Santiago Henao Villegas
Journal:  Vet Anim Sci       Date:  2018-08-01

9.  Noise assessment in slaughterhouses by means of a smartphone app.

Authors:  Maria Francesca Iulietto; Paola Sechi; Clelia Mansi Gaudenzi; Luca Grispoldi; Margherita Ceccarelli; Salvatore Barbera; Beniamino Terzo Cenci-Goga
Journal:  Ital J Food Saf       Date:  2018-07-03

10.  Methods to Prevent Future Severe Animal Welfare Problems Caused by COVID-19 in the Pork Industry.

Authors:  Temple Grandin
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 2.752

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.