Literature DB >> 11229991

Psychiatrists disciplined by a state medical board.

J Morrison1, T Morrison.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study determined the risk of discipline by a medical board for psychiatrists relative to other physicians and assessed the contributions to such risk.
METHOD: Physicians disciplined by the California Medical Board in a 30-month period were compared with matched groups of nondisciplined physicians.
RESULTS: Among 584 disciplined physicians, there were 75 (12.8%) psychiatrists, nearly twice the number of psychiatrists among nondisciplined physicians. Female psychiatrists were underrepresented in the disciplined group. Psychiatrists were significantly more likely than nonpsychiatrist physicians to be disciplined for sexual relationships with patients and about as likely to be charged with negligence or incompetence. The disciplined and nondisciplined psychiatrists did not differ significantly from a group of 75 nondisciplined psychiatrists on years since medical school graduation, international medical graduate status, or board certification. The disciplined group included significantly more psychiatrists who claimed child psychiatry as their first or second specialty and significantly fewer psychoanalysts.
CONCLUSIONS: Organized psychiatry has an obligation to address sexual contact with patients and other causes for medical board discipline. This obligation may be addressable through enhanced residency training, recertification exams, and other means of education.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11229991     DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.3.474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0002-953X            Impact factor:   18.112


  9 in total

1.  Healthcare fraud and abuse.

Authors:  William J Rudman; John S Eberhardt; William Pierce; Susan Hart-Hester
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2009-09-16

2.  Effects of gender on performance in medicine.

Authors:  Jenny Firth-Cozens
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-04-05

3.  Forty-Five Years of Civil Litigation Against Canadian Psychiatrists: An Empirical Pilot Study.

Authors:  Mansfield Mela; Glen Luther; Thomas G Gutheil
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.356

4.  Risk factors at medical school for subsequent professional misconduct: multicentre retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Janet Yates; David James
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-04-27

5.  How broad are state physician health program descriptions of physician impairment?

Authors:  Nicholas D Lawson; J Wesley Boyd
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2018-08-23

6.  A focused mapping review and synthesis of a priori risk factors associated with medical misconduct.

Authors:  Edward Croft; Maria Tighe Clark; Nikolaos Efstathiou; Caroline Bradbury-Jones
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2019-06-29

7.  Engagement, not personal characteristics, was associated with the seriousness of regulatory adjudication decisions about physicians: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Javier A Caballero; Steve P Brown
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 8.775

8.  Complaint risk among mental health practitioners compared with physical health practitioners: a retrospective cohort study of complaints to health regulators in Australia.

Authors:  Benjamin G Veness; Holly Tibble; Brin Fs Grenyer; Jennifer M Morris; Matthew J Spittal; Louise Nash; David M Studdert; Marie M Bismark
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  The characteristics of psychiatrists disciplined by professional colleges in Canada.

Authors:  Asim Alam; Paul Kurdyak; Jason Klemensberg; Joshua Griesman; Chaim M Bell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.