Literature DB >> 11229956

Ability of patients to accurately recall the severity of acute painful events.

A J Singer1, A Kowalska, H C Thode.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Pain studies require prospective patient enrollment to ensure accurate pain assessment. The authors correlated pain assessments of an acute painful episode over a one-week period and determined the accuracy of patient pain severity recall over time.
METHODS: This was a prospective, descriptive, longitudinal study. Participants were a convenience sample of 50 emergency department patients with acute pain resulting from injuries or painful invasive procedures. A trained research assistant administered a structured pain survey containing demographic and historical features to all patients. Patients sequentially assessed their pain severity using a vertical 100-mm visual analog scale marked "most pain" at the top, a verbal numeric rating scale ranging from 0 to 100 from none to worst (NRS100), and a verbal numeric rating scale ranging from 0 to 10 from none to worst (NRS10). Patients were contacted by phone and asked to reassess their initial pain severity one and seven days later using the two verbal numeric rating scales. Analysis of pain assessments using the various scales at the three time intervals was performed with Pearson's and Spearman's coefficients and repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA).
RESULTS: There were 50 patients with a mean age of 41 years. Correlation between initial pain assessments on the three scales ranged from 0.83 to 0.92. Correlations between the initial and 24-hour assessments were NRS100-0.98 and NRS10-0.98. Correlations between the initial and one-week assessments were NRS100-0.96 and NRS10-0.97. Repeated-measures ANOVA showed no significant change in pain assessments over time for both verbal numeric scales.
CONCLUSIONS: Pain severity assessments of acute painful events one and seven days later were similar and highly correlated with initial assessments using both verbal numeric scales. Patients accurately recall the severity of an acute painful episode for at least one week after its occurrence, which may allow retrospective pain assessments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11229956     DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01310.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  8 in total

1.  [Coblation tonsillectomy. Results of a pilot study].

Authors:  J P Windfuhr; J C Deck; C Krabs; R Sadra; S Remmert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Accuracy of patient recall of hand and elbow disability on the QuickDASH questionnaire over a two-year period.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Stepan; Daniel A London; Martin I Boyer; Ryan P Calfee
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  Pain relief for the removal of femoral sheath in interventional cardiology adult patients.

Authors:  Cynthia J Wensley; Bridie Kent; Mike B McAleer; Sue M Price; Jim T Stewart
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-10-08

4.  Peripheral nerve blocks and incidence of post-operative neurogenic complaints and pain scores.

Authors:  Chloe Mellecker; John Albright; Randy Clark
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2012

5.  Diclofenac potassium restores objective and subjective measures of sleep quality in women with primary dysmenorrhea.

Authors:  Stella Iacovides; Ingrid Avidon; Alison Bentley; Fiona C Baker
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.849

6.  Trial design of comparing patient-specific versus weight-based protocols to treat vaso-occlusive episodes in sickle cell disease (COMPARE-VOE).

Authors:  Stephanie O Ibemere; Sarah B Dubbs; Huiman X Barnhart; Jacqueline L Brown; Caroline E Freiermuth; Patricia Kavanagh; Judith A Paice; John J Strouse; R Gentry Wilkerson; Paula Tanabe
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 2.226

7.  A comparison of conventional and retrospective measures of change in symptoms after elective surgery.

Authors:  Eva M Bitzer; Marco Petrucci; Christoph Lorenz; Rugzan Hussein; Hans Dörning; Alf Trojan; Stefan Nickel
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 3.186

8.  Carrying water may be a major contributor to disability from musculoskeletal disorders in low income countries: a cross-sectional survey in South Africa, Ghana and Vietnam.

Authors:  Jo-Anne Geere; Jamie Bartram; Laura Bates; Leslie Danquah; Barbara Evans; Michael B Fisher; Nora Groce; Batsirai Majuru; Michael M Mokoena; Murembiwa S Mukhola; Hung Nguyen-Viet; Phuc Pham Duc; Ashley Rhoderick Williams; Wolf-Peter Schmidt; Paul R Hunter
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.413

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.