Literature DB >> 11228458

Efficacy of evaluation of audiometric results after stapes surgery in otosclerosis. I. The effects of using different audiologic parameters and criteria on success rates.

A J de Bruijn1, R A Tange, W A Dreschler.   

Abstract

The Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery proposed guidelines to provide more uniformity in reporting hearing results after middle ear surgery. One of the proposals was to include the hearing thresholds at 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 kHz in a 4-frequency pure-tone average (PTA) and to use post-operative bone-conduction (BC) levels rather than preoperative BC levels in describing postoperative air-bone gaps (ABGs). The hearing results of 451 stapes operations were evaluated to analyze to what extent the choice of different audiologic criteria affects success rates. It appeared that choice of PTA significantly affects postoperative gain in air-conduction thresholds and ABG levels. If one takes the improvements in speech-reception thresholds as the gold standard, the gain in air-conduction correlates best with a gain in speech-reception threshold if a higher frequency, such as 3 or 4 kHz, is included in a 4-frequency PTA. Also, choice of preoperative or postoperative BC in computing postoperative ABGs had a significant effect on the mean postoperative ABG levels, showing more favorable results with the use of preoperative BC thresholds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11228458     DOI: 10.1067/mhn.2001.111601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  8 in total

1.  Technical and functional hearing results after unilateral stapes surgery for otosclerosis at Cluj-Napoca University Hospital.

Authors:  Alma Maniu; Marcel Cosgarea
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  [Microsurgical middle ear operations : Variability of the audiometric results from frequency variations].

Authors:  L von Gierke; I Baumann; P K Plinkert; M Praetorius
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 3.  Comparison of different oval window sealing materials in stapes surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alfonso Scarpa; Pasquale Marra; Massimo Ralli; Pasquale Viola; Federico Maria Gioacchini; Giuseppe Chiarella; Francesco Antonio Salzano; Pietro De Luca; Filippo Ricciardiello; Claudia Cassandro; Grazia Maria Corbi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 3.236

4.  [Measurement of quality of life following stapes surgery].

Authors:  A J C Hazenberg; F F Hoppe; S Dazert; A Minovi
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Long-term hearing results of stapedotomy: analysis of factors affecting outcome.

Authors:  Ingeborg Dhooge; Stéphanie Desmedt; Thomas Maly; David Loose; Helen Van Hoecke
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Effectiveness of stapedotomy in improving hearing sensitivity for 53 otosclerotic patients: retrospective review.

Authors:  Farid Alzhrani; Mohammad M Mokhatrish; Murad O Al-Momani; Hassan Alshehri; Abdulrahman Hagr; Soha N Garadat
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.526

7.  Results of stapes surgery for otosclerosis with two kinds of prosthesis in residency training.

Authors:  Celso Dall Igna; Vanessa Niemiec Teixeira; Daniela Pernigotti Dall Igna; Letícia Petersen Schmid Rosito
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec

8.  Stapes surgery in residency: the UFPR clinical hospital experience.

Authors:  Adriano Ulisses Caldart; Igor Terruel; Dair Jocely Enge; Adriana Sayuri Kurogi; Maurício Buschle; Marcos Mocellin
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.