Literature DB >> 11227869

[Contractions of the lymphangion under low filling conditions and the absence of stretching stimuli. The possibility of the sucking effect].

A A Gashev1, R S Orlov, D C Zawieja.   

Abstract

Regulation of the function of the lymphatic pump is tightly connected to the degree of filling of the lymphangion. This mechanism is one of the principle ways that the lymphatics self-regulate lymph transport. But interpretation of the causes and consequences of this regulation is still far from perfect. The issue of whether automatism of electrical activity of the lymphatic smooth muscle cells or the distension of the cell membranes first causes depolarization, is a principal question which needs answering in order to understand the control of lymph transport. In our experiments with perfused isolated bovine mesenteric lymphangions, different values of lymph pressure were simulated. For this purpose, lowfrequency sinusoidal fluctuations of the input pressure were applied to lymphangions under conditions of regulated filling. A poor correlation was seen between lymph pressure fluctuations and lymphangion contractions, as well as between the rate of lymphangion filling and contractions. We observed stable spontaneous contractions of both bovine and rat mesenteric lymphangions at 0 cm of water intralymphatic pressure, and in the absence of distension stimuli (both radial and axial stretch). Under conditions of low filling, contractions of bovine lymphangions produced negative intralymphatic pressure and a suction effect. The automatism is an inherent feature of the lymphatic smooth muscle cells. Distension of the lymphangion modulates the electrical characteristics of the membranes and thus the contractile mechanisms in lymphangions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11227869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ross Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova        ISSN: 0869-8139


  7 in total

1.  Myogenic constriction and dilation of isolated lymphatic vessels.

Authors:  Michael J Davis; Ann M Davis; Christine W Ku; Anatoliy A Gashev
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  Rate-sensitive contractile responses of lymphatic vessels to circumferential stretch.

Authors:  Michael J Davis; Ann M Davis; Megan M Lane; Christine W Ku; Anatoliy A Gashev
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Determinants of valve gating in collecting lymphatic vessels from rat mesentery.

Authors:  Michael J Davis; Elaheh Rahbar; Anatoliy A Gashev; David C Zawieja; James E Moore
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.733

4.  Estimation of the Pressure Drop Required for Lymph Flow through Initial Lymphatic Networks.

Authors:  David C Sloas; Scott A Stewart; Richard S Sweat; Travis M Doggett; Natascha G Alves; Jerome W Breslin; Donald P Gaver; Walter L Murfee
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 2.589

Review 5.  Convective diffusion of nanoparticles from the epithelial barrier toward regional lymph nodes.

Authors:  Stanislav S Dukhin; Mohamed E Labib
Journal:  Adv Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 12.984

6.  Hydrodynamic regulation of lymphatic transport and the impact of aging.

Authors:  Anatoliy A Gashev; David C Zawieja
Journal:  Pathophysiology       Date:  2010-03-11

7.  Demonstration and Analysis of the Suction Effect for Pumping Lymph from Tissue Beds at Subatmospheric Pressure.

Authors:  Samira Jamalian; Mohammad Jafarnejad; Scott D Zawieja; Christopher D Bertram; Anatoliy A Gashev; David C Zawieja; Michael J Davis; James E Moore
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.