Literature DB >> 11226506

Perceptual grouping via spatial selection in a focused-attention task.

M S Kim1, K R Cave.   

Abstract

Theories of attention can be separated into those that select by location, and those that select by location-invariant representation. Experiments demonstrating stronger interference or facilitation from distractors grouped by nonspatial features with the target than ungrouped distractors have been considered as evidence for the selection of location-invariant representations. However, few studies have measured spatial attention directly at the locations of the grouped or ungrouped objects. In these experiments subjects responded to spatial probes (dots) while also identifying a cued target letter among distractors. Probe responses were faster for distractor locations with the target color than for those with the nontarget color, implying that target-color locations receive more attention. This pattern of spatial attention may explain why target-color distractors interfere more with target identification than nontarget-color distractors. These results suggest that although attention can be directed by nonspatial properties such as grouping by color or organization of the scene into objects, selection may ultimately be based on location.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11226506     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00285-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  9 in total

1.  Space-, object-, and feature-based attention interact to organize visual scenes.

Authors:  Dwight J Kravitz; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  The timing of stimulus localisation and the Simon effect: an ERP study.

Authors:  Edmund Wascher
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-02-12       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Displaywide visual features associated with a search display's appearance can mediate attentional capture.

Authors:  Bryan R Burnham
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-06

4.  Saliency modulates global perception in simultanagnosia.

Authors:  Elisabeth Huberle; Hans-Otto Karnath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Target-flanker similarity effects reflect image segmentation not perceptual grouping.

Authors:  Cathleen M Moore; Sihan He; Qingzi Zheng; J Toby Mordkoff
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.157

6.  Attention in neglect and extinction: assessing the degree of correspondence between visual and auditory impairments using matched tasks.

Authors:  Doug J K Barrett; A Mark Edmondson-Jones; Deborah A Hall
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.475

7.  A world unglued: simultanagnosia as a spatial restriction of attention.

Authors:  Kirsten A Dalrymple; Jason J S Barton; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Spatial and temporal dynamics of attentional guidance during inefficient visual search.

Authors:  Alexandre Zenon; Suliann Ben Hamed; Jean-René Duhamel; Etienne Olivier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  fMRI correlates of object-based attentional facilitation vs. suppression of irrelevant stimuli, dependent on global grouping and endogenous cueing.

Authors:  Elliot D Freeman; Emiliano Macaluso; Geraint Rees; Jon Driver
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.