Literature DB >> 11225451

[Adjustable silicone gastric banding (ASGB, Bioenterics) and the Swedish adjustable gastric banding (SAGB, Obtech) in treatment of morbid obesity].

U J Hesse1, F Berrevoet, W Ceelen, K Mortele, A Cardon, R Troisi, P Pattyn.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Two different adjustable silicone gastric bandings were laparoscopically applied and compared regarding per- and postoperative complications and successful weight loss. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 120 consecutive patients received a laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and were prospectively documented. In the learning phase (LP) 50 patients were treated with an Adjustable Silicone Gastric Banding (ASGB, Bioenterics) using an intragastric balloon calibration technique according to Belachew. Group I (n = 29) received the same band using a surgical technique with tunneling behind the oesophagus towards His' angle, while the second group (n = 41) received a Swedish Adjustable Gastric Banding (SAGB), using the same technique as in group I. A BMI of > 35, complications secondary to obesity and failed diets were the indication for the operation. Thirty patients were male, 90 female, with a mean age of 37 years (18-60).
RESULTS: In the LP 8 patients had to be reoperated (16%) for band slippage and/or pouch dilatation, in group I 6 (19%) and in group II 1 (3%) (P = 0.02, II vs I). The mean hospital stay was 3.7 +/- 0.5, 3.4 +/- 0.8 and 3.3 +/- 0.4 days in LP, I und II, respectively. LONG-TERM
RESULTS: After a mean of 24 months (19-42) the loss of body weight was 8.4 kg after 3, 13.9 kg after 6, 22.1 kg after 12 and 27.8 kg after 18 months in the LP. In group I after a mean of 14 months (12-19) 10.3 kg after 3, 18.7 kg after 6, 24.8 kg after 12 months. In group II after a mean of 10 months (6-16) the loss of body weight was 7.9 kg after 3 and 19.4 kg after 6 months.
CONCLUSION: In our experience it appears that the SAGB is easy to handle and less prone to complications such as dysphagia and slipping, probably due to good fixation of the band due to its width. A prospective randomized trial is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11225451     DOI: 10.1007/s001040051261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  5 in total

1.  Surgical treatment of severe obesity with a low-pressure adjustable gastric band: experimental data and clinical results in 625 patients.

Authors:  Wim Ceelen; Jean Walder; Anne Cardon; Katrien Van Renterghem; Uwe Hesse; Mohamed El Malt; Piet Pattyn
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Evidence-based medicine: open and laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

Authors:  P Gentileschi; S Kini; M Catarci; M Gagner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-01-04       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Short- and long-term results of laparoscopic gastric banding for morbid obesity.

Authors:  Marco Bueter; Joern Maroske; Andreas Thalheimer; Martin Gasser; Theresa Stingl; Johannes Heimbucher; Detlef Meyer; Karl-Hermann Fuchs; Martin Fein
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Laparoscopic gastric banding: a prospective, randomized study comparing the Lapband and the SAGB: early results.

Authors:  Michel Suter; Vittorio Giusti; Marc Worreth; Eric Héraief; Jean-Marie Calmes
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. A prospective randomized study comparing the Swedish Adjustable Gastric Band and the MiniMizer Extra: one-year results.

Authors:  Tomas Abalikšta; Gintautas Brimas; Kęstutis Strupas
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 1.195

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.