Literature DB >> 11224901

Surface topography, Cobb angles, and cosmetic change in scoliosis.

C J Goldberg1, M Kaliszer, D P Moore, E E Fogarty, F E Dowling.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Preliminary analysis of the clinical value of surface topography in a spinal deformity clinic.
OBJECTIVES: The Cobb angle is the gold standard for the monitoring of scoliosis. This study was designed to determine whether surface topography would reflect Cobb angle status with sufficient reliability to permit its safe use as an alternative means of documentation in some circumstances. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Surface topography offers the possibility of describing spinal deformity more fully than radiographic measures alone. To be useful, it must ignore changes due to varying posture and reliably detect differences that are clinically significant, while broadening the ability to assess deformity.
METHODS: Surface topography using Quantec () was obtained routinely in all patients attending a spinal deformity unit. Intrasubject variation was reduced by taking the mean for each parameter of four repositioned scans, which gives a smallest detectable change on all measures of approximately 10 U. Fifty-nine patients with two sets of radiographs and topography scans were studied to determine the ability of the different measurements to detect significant change.
RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between Cobb angle and Quantec spinal angle. A significant change in Cobb angle could be identified by associated change in at least one topographic measure in a significant proportion of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: It is unlikely that topography will supplant radiography for the ascertainment of Cobb angles, because the error margins of both are wide, and the two are not measuring the same aspect of the deformity. The Quantec system is useful in patient monitoring as an alternative to radiography, without diminishing the standard of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11224901     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200102150-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  44 in total

1.  Iliac crest orientation and geometry in able-bodied and non-treated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis girls with moderate and severe spinal deformity.

Authors:  Georgios A Stylianides; Marléne Beaulieu; Georges Dalleau; Charles-Hilaire Rivard; Paul Allard
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Accuracy assessment of human trunk surface 3D reconstructions from an optical digitising system.

Authors:  V Pazos; F Cheriet; L Song; H Labelle; J Dansereau
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  Clinical investigation and imaging.

Authors:  Daniel Studer
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 1.548

4.  Assessment of curve progression on children with idiopathic scoliosis using ultrasound imaging method.

Authors:  Rui Zheng; Doug Hill; Douglas Hedden; Marc Moreau; Sarah Southon; Edmond Lou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  No effect of osteopathic treatment on trunk morphology and spine flexibility in young women with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Carol Hasler; Caius Schmid; Andreas Enggist; Conny Neuhaus; Thomas Erb
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 1.548

6.  Is rasterstereography a valid noninvasive method for the screening of juvenile and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

Authors:  Tito Bassani; Elena Stucovitz; Fabio Galbusera; Marco Brayda-Bruno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  The Trunk Appearance Perception Scale (TAPS): a new tool to evaluate subjective impression of trunk deformity in patients with idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Juan Bago; Judith Sanchez-Raya; Francisco Javier Sanchez Perez-Grueso; Jose Maria Climent
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2010-03-25

8.  A review of the trunk surface metrics used as Scoliosis and other deformities evaluation indices.

Authors:  Petros Patias; Theodoros B Grivas; Angelos Kaspiris; Costas Aggouris; Evangelos Drakoutos
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2010-06-29

9.  Scoliosis: a review.

Authors:  Caroline J Goldberg; David P Moore; Esmond E Fogarty; Frank E Dowling
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2007-09-22       Impact factor: 1.827

10.  Methodology of evaluation of morphology of the spine and the trunk in idiopathic scoliosis and other spinal deformities - 6th SOSORT consensus paper.

Authors:  Tomasz Kotwicki; Stefano Negrini; Theodoros B Grivas; Manuel Rigo; Toru Maruyama; Jacek Durmala; Fabio Zaina
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2009-11-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.