Literature DB >> 11224865

Randomized controlled trial of percutaneous intradiscal radiofrequency thermocoagulation for chronic discogenic back pain: lack of effect from a 90-second 70 C lesion.

G A Barendse1, S G van Den Berg, A H Kessels, W E Weber, M van Kleef.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective double-blind randomized trial in 28 patients.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical effect of percutaneous intradiscal radiofrequency thermocoagulation for reducing pain, functional disability, and physical impairment in patients with chronic discogenic low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Chronic discogenic low back pain is a challenging problem in western countries. A treatment option is radiofrequency heating of the affected disc. Its clinical efficacy has never been formally tested in a controlled trial.
METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with a history of at least 1 year of chronic low back pain were selected on the basis of a diagnostic anesthetization of the lower intervertebral discs. Only patients with one putative painful level were selected and randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. Each patient in the radiofrequency treatment group (n = 13) received a 90-second 70 C lesion of the intervertebral disc. Patients in the control group (n = 15) underwent the same procedure, but without use of radiofrequency current. Both the treating physician and the patients were blinded to the group assignment. Before treatment, physical impairment, rating of pain, the degree of disability, and quality of life were assessed by a blinded investigator.
RESULTS: Eight weeks after treatment, there was one success in the radiofrequency group (n = 13) and two in the control group (n = 15). The adjusted and unadjusted odds ratio was 0.5 and 1.1, respectively (not significant). Also, visual analog scores for pain, global perceived effect, and the Oswestry disability scale showed no differences between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous intradiscal radiofrequency thermocoagulation (90 seconds, 70 C) is not effective in reducing chronic discogenic low back pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11224865     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200102010-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  29 in total

Review 1.  IDET: a critical appraisal of the evidence.

Authors:  Brian J C Freeman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Outcome of invasive treatment modalities on back pain and sciatica: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Maurits W van Tulder; Bart Koes; Seppo Seitsalo; Antti Malmivaara
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  [Evidence and consensus based Austrian guidelines for management of acute and chronic nonspecific backache].

Authors: 
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 4.  Responder analyses in randomised controlled trials for chronic low back pain: an overview of currently used methods.

Authors:  Nicholas Henschke; Annefloor van Enst; Robert Froud; Raymond W G Ostelo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  [Facet blockade, peridural and periradicular pain therapy].

Authors:  T Waggershauser; S Schwarzkopf; M Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  One-year follow-up results of intradiscal diode laser, radiofrequency, and pulsed radiofrequency therapies: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Korgün Ökmen; Burcu Metin Ökmen
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 7.  Injection therapy and denervation procedures for chronic low-back pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicholas Henschke; Ton Kuijpers; Sidney M Rubinstein; Marienke van Middelkoop; Raymond Ostelo; Arianne Verhagen; Bart W Koes; Maurits W van Tulder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Intradiscal electrothermal therapy, percutaneous discectomy, and nucleoplasty: what is the current evidence?

Authors:  Brian J C Freeman; Roshana Mehdian
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2008-01

Review 9.  Nonoperative management of discogenic back pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Young Lu; Javier Z Guzman; Devina Purmessur; James C Iatridis; Andrew C Hecht; Sheeraz A Qureshi; Samuel K Cho
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The role of radiofrequency in the treatment of mechanical pain of spinal origin.

Authors:  Y Pevsner; S Shabat; A Catz; Y Folman; R Gepstein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.