Literature DB >> 11224864

Global spinal motion in subjects with lumbar spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: does the grade or type of slip affect global spinal motion?

A H McGregor1, H R Cattermole, S P Hughes.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This was a prospective pilot study to investigate the global motion characteristics of the spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis populations.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to determine the influence of a spondylolisthesis or a spondylolysis on global spinal motion and to establish whether this is dependent on the cause of the slip or the degree/grade of the slip. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The condition of spondylolisthesis has been extensively discussed in the literature with respect to its etiology and management. However, the mechanics and movement of the spine in relation to pathology and the effect of this condition on function have received scant attention.
METHODS: The motion of the lumbar spine was investigated in 31 patients (19 men, 12 women, mean age 47.7 +/- 17.8 years) who were diagnosed as having either a lumbar spondylolysis or a spondylolisthesis. These patients were compared with a preexisting database of 203 normal subjects (100 men, 103 women, mean age 39.8 +/- 13.4 years). Patients were graded according to the type of spondylolisthesis or spondylolysis they had, and the extent of slip was rated using Meyerding's classification (1932) and measured directly using methods of Boxall et al (1979) and Wiltse et al (1983).
RESULTS: Direct measurements of the extent of slip using Boxall et al (1979) and Wiltse et al (1983) methods were found to have no significant correlation with the resultant range of motion (ROM) or the speed of movement. This study suggests that motion parameters are influenced by the grade of slip in patients with spondylolisthesis, and the type of spondylolisthesis i.e., whether isthmic or degenerative. In the A-P flexion-extension plane, the results indicate that subjects with a defect only, i.e., a spondylolysis, and thus no slip present with a spinal hypermobility (P < 0.01). Subjects with an isthmic slip tend to be either slightly hypermobile or within the anticipated range of motion, whereas those subjects with a degenerative slip tend to be hypomobile (P < 0.05). Movements into lateral flexion were restricted in both the isthmic and degenerative spondylolisthesis patients, whereas rotation was only influenced by the level at which the defect occurred. In terms of degree of displacement, in higher grades of displacement, there was a trend towards hypermobility.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that the grade and type of spondylolisthesis do influence global motion parameters. This information may be useful in the clinical assessment of this patient group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11224864     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200102010-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  4 in total

1.  Classification-based approach for management of an adolescent with LBP, lower extremity pain, and a relevant postural deformity.

Authors:  Jason Dudzic; Brett Szymusiak; Hannah McCormick; Eric R Miller
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2011-02

2.  Spine patient outcomes research trial: radiographic predictors of clinical outcomes after operative or nonoperative treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Adam M Pearson; Jon D Lurie; Emily A Blood; John W Frymoyer; Heike Braeutigam; Howard An; Federico P Girardi; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Towards standardized measurement of adverse events in spine surgery: conceptual model and pilot evaluation.

Authors:  Sohail K Mirza; Richard A Deyo; Patrick J Heagerty; Judith A Turner; Lorri A Lee; Robert Goodkin
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Reliability and validity of an iPhone(®) application for the measurement of lumbar spine flexion and extension range of motion.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Pourahmadi; Morteza Taghipour; Elham Jannati; Mohammad Ali Mohseni-Bandpei; Ismail Ebrahimi Takamjani; Fatemeh Rajabzadeh
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 2.984

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.