Literature DB >> 11224471

Sex differences in discriminative stimulus effects of morphine in the rat.

R.M. Craft1, P.W. Kalivas, J.A. Stratmann.   

Abstract

Nine female and ten male rats were trained to discriminate 3.0mg/kg s.c. morphine from saline. The six female rats that acquired and maintained the morphine discrimination did so in significantly fewer sessions than the eight males did (28 +/- 5 vs 51 +/- 9 sessions, respectively), and the ED(50) for morphine substitution was significantly lower in females (0.69 +/- 0.15 vs 1.28 +/- 0.20mg/kg). The time course of morphine substitution was approximately equivalent in females and males. The µ agonist fentanyl completely substituted for morphine in both sexes, with no sex difference in potency to substitute for morphine. The µ agonist buprenorphine partially or completely substituted for morphine in all females and five of six males, but at a lower dose in females (ED(50) 0.009 +/- 0.002 vs 0.019 +/- 0.006mg/kg). The delta agonist BW373U86 partially substituted for morphine in both sexes, with no potency differences; the kappa agonist U69,593 and the non-opioid cocaine did not substitute for morphine in either sex. On a test of spontaneous locomotor activity, morphine increased locomotion to a slightly but not significantly greater extent in males than in females. Morphine also produced significantly greater hotplate antinociception in males than in females. Further drug discrimination training with a lower dose of morphine, 1.0mg/kg, decreased the ED(50) for morphine substitution in females and males to 0.26 +/- 0.06 vs 0.45 +/- 0.11mg/kg, respectively (not significant). In a separate group of age-matched rats, there was no sex difference in brain or plasma levels of morphine measured via HPLC 20min post-injection, the pretreatment time used to examine behavioral effects of morphine. The HPLC results, plus the fact that sex differences were not the same for all behavioral effects of morphine, suggest that sex differences in discriminative stimulus effects of morphine are not due to differential pharmacokinetics. The possibility that sex differences in morphine discrimination reflect sex differences in opioid receptor pharmacology, or differential reinforcement between morphine and saline levers for males but not females, is discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  1996        PMID: 11224471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Pharmacol        ISSN: 0955-8810            Impact factor:   2.293


  16 in total

1.  PAG mu opioid receptor activation underlies sex differences in morphine antinociception.

Authors:  Scott A Bernal; Michael M Morgan; Rebecca M Craft
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Sex differences in the anatomical and functional organization of the periaqueductal gray-rostral ventromedial medullary pathway in the rat: a potential circuit mediating the sexually dimorphic actions of morphine.

Authors:  Dayna R Loyd; Anne Z Murphy
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2006-06-10       Impact factor: 3.215

3.  Periadolescent male but not female rats have higher motor activity in response to morphine than do adult rats.

Authors:  David A White; Clifford C Michaels; Stephen G Holtzman
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 3.533

4.  Effects of repeated morphine on ultrasonic vocalizations in adult rats: increased 50-kHz call rate and altered subtype profile.

Authors:  Laura M Best; Leah L Zhao; Tina Scardochio; Paul B S Clarke
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Reinforcement schedule effects in rats trained to discriminate 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) or cocaine.

Authors:  Daniel Kueh; Lisa E Baker
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-09-23       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Sex differences in locomotor effects of morphine in the rat.

Authors:  Rebecca M Craft; James L Clark; Stephen P Hart; Megan K Pinckney
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 3.533

7.  Role of gonadal hormones on mu-opioid-stimulated [³⁵S]GTPγS binding and morphine-mediated antinociception in male and female Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Peckham; Steven M Graves; Emily Jutkiewicz; Jill B Becker; John R Traynor
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 8.  Role of training dose in drug discrimination: a review.

Authors:  Ian P Stolerman; Emma Childs; Matthew M Ford; Kathleen A Grant
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.293

9.  Association of OPRM1 A118G variant with the relative reinforcing value of nicotine.

Authors:  R Ray; C Jepson; F Patterson; A Strasser; M Rukstalis; K Perkins; K G Lynch; S O'Malley; W H Berrettini; C Lerman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Sex differences in micro-opioid receptor expression in the rat midbrain periaqueductal gray are essential for eliciting sex differences in morphine analgesia.

Authors:  Dayna R Loyd; Xioaya Wang; Anne Z Murphy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.