Literature DB >> 11224191

Pharmacological specificity of the caffeine discriminative stimulus in humans: effects of theophylline, methylphenidate and buspirone.

A.H. Oliveto1, W.K. Bickel, J.R. Hughes, S.Y. Terry, S.T. Higgins, G.J. Badger.   

Abstract

The present study examined further the pharmacological specificity of the methylxanthine CNS stimulant caffeine as a discriminative stimulus in humans. Nine normal healthy volunteers (ages 19-39) were trained to discriminate between caffeine (320mg/70kg, p.o.) and placebo, using monetary reinforcement of correct letter code identification. After four training sessions, subjects were tested with the training conditions until they were >80% correct on four consecutive sessions. Then dose-effect curves were determined for caffeine (56-320mg/70kg), theophylline (56-320mg/70kg), methylphenidate (10-56mg/70kg), and buspirone (1-32mg/70kg). Seven of nine subjects met the discrimination criterion within four to nine sessions. During dose-effect curve determinations, caffeine and methylphenidate each produced dose-related increases in caffeine-appropriate responding. Theophylline produced caffeine-appropriate responding that was not dose related in a consistent manner across subjects, occasioning an average of 50% caffeine-appropriate responding at most doses tested. Buspirone produced predominantly placebo-appropriate responding. Caffeine-appropriate responding tended to be directly related to ARCI LSD scores, self-reported "bad" effects, "high", and stimulant-bad effects and inversely related to ARCI PCAG scores and sedative ratings. These results agree with non-human data and suggest that the caffeine discriminative stimulus has pharmacological specificity, in that caffeine-appropriate responding generalizes to other stimulants such as theophylline or methylphenidate, but not to non-stimulant compounds such as buspirone.

Entities:  

Year:  1993        PMID: 11224191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Pharmacol        ISSN: 0955-8810            Impact factor:   2.293


  3 in total

1.  Gender Differences in Subjective and Physiological Responses to Caffeine and the Role of Steroid Hormones.

Authors:  Jennifer L Temple; Amanda M Ziegler
Journal:  J Caffeine Res       Date:  2011-03

2.  Drug tasting may confound human drug discrimination studies.

Authors:  M E Abreu; R R Griffiths
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  Human drug discrimination and multiple chemical sensitivity: caffeine exposure as an experimental model.

Authors:  T Eissenberg; R R Griffiths
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 9.031

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.