Literature DB >> 11224189

Buspirone and lorazepam abuse liability in humans: behavioral effects, subjective effects and choice.

J.R. Troisi 2nd1, T.S. Critchfield, R.R. Griffiths.   

Abstract

This study compared behavioral and subjective effects of two anxiolytics, the benzodiazepine lorazepam and the azaspirodecanedione buspirone, in healthy male volunteers with histories of sedative drug abuse. Placebo, lorazepam (1, 2, 4, 8mg/70kg) and buspirone (15, 30, 60, 120mg/70kg) were administered p.o. in a mixed sequence in a double-blind, cross-over design. Lorazepam, but not buspirone, decreased psychomotor/cognitive performance. Both drugs produced similar increases in ratings of drug strength, however the onset and offset times for lorazepam were later than for buspirone. Lorazepam increased ratings of liking in contrast to buspirone which produced negative mood-related subjective effects (e.g. increases in ratings of disliking, bad/unpleasant effects, and tension-anxiety). Lorazepam was categorized by subjects as producing effects similar to barbiturates or benzodiazepines in contrast to buspirone which was not. When subjects were given a choice between self-administering an intermediate dose of lorazepam (4mg/70kg) or buspirone (60mg/70kg), which produced similar ratings of drug strength, eight out of nine subjects chose lorazepam. This study provides the clearest human experimental evidence to date that the abuse liability of buspirone is lower than that of a prototypic benzodiazepine, even at supratherapeutic doses.

Entities:  

Year:  1993        PMID: 11224189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Pharmacol        ISSN: 0955-8810            Impact factor:   2.293


  5 in total

1.  Preference for diazepam, but not buspirone, in moderate drinkers.

Authors:  S M Evans; R R Griffiths; H de Wit
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Commentary on review by Woods and Winger. Benzodiazepines: long-term use among patients is a concern and abuse among polydrug abusers is not trivial.

Authors:  R R Griffiths
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Discriminative stimulus effects of diazepam and buspirone in normal volunteers.

Authors:  C R Rush; T S Critchfield; J R Troisi; R R Griffiths
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Line bisection performance in patients with generalized anxiety disorder and treatment-resistant depression.

Authors:  Wei He; Hao Chai; Yingchun Zhang; Shaohua Yu; Wei Chen; Wei Wang
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Buspirone reduces sexual risk-taking intent but not cocaine self-administration.

Authors:  B Levi Bolin; Joshua A Lile; Katherine R Marks; Joshua S Beckmann; Craig R Rush; William W Stoops
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.157

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.