Literature DB >> 11222964

Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying motor evoked potentials in anesthetized humans. Part 1. Recovery time of corticospinal tract direct waves elicited by pairs of transcranial electrical stimuli.

V Deletis1, V Isgum, V E Amassian.   

Abstract

Direct (D) corticospinal tract discharges were recorded epidurally in patients at anesthetic depths suppressing indirect (I) activity and were elicited by two equal transcranial electrical stimuli. The recovery of amplitude of the second D wave (D2) was a function of the interstimulus interval (ISI) and the stimulus duration. For example, with a 100 micros pulse, there was no response at an ISI of 1.1 ms, but partial recovery occurred with a 500 micros pulse. This indicates a relative refractory component at this ISI. Both D2 amplitude and conduction time recovered completely using a 4 ms ISI, with evidence of increased amplitude and reduced conduction time (supernormality) at longer ISIs. These findings are relevant in explaining high frequency D and I discharges and facilitation of motor responses by two transcranial magnetic pulses. Furthermore, these data help to understand why an ISI of 4 ms would be optimal in eliciting limb muscle responses when a short train of transcranial stimuli elicits only D waves in anesthetized patients (Deletis et al., Clin Neurophysiol 112 (2001) 445).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11222964     DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(01)00461-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  15 in total

1.  Mechanisms of intracortical I-wave facilitation elicited with paired-pulse magnetic stimulation in humans.

Authors:  Ritsuko Hanajima; Yoshikazu Ugawa; Yasuo Terao; Hiroyuki Enomoto; Yasushi Shiio; Hitoshi Mochizuki; Toshiaki Furubayashi; Haruo Uesugi; Nobue Kobayashi Iwata; Ichiro Kanazawa
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Short-interval paired-pulse inhibition and facilitation of human motor cortex: the dimension of stimulus intensity.

Authors:  Tihomir V Ilić; Frank Meintzschel; Ulrich Cleff; Diane Ruge; Kirn R Kessler; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Two phases of short-interval intracortical inhibition.

Authors:  Lailoma Roshan; Guillermo O Paradiso; Robert Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Improved neuromonitoring during spinal surgery using double-train transcranial electrical stimulation.

Authors:  H L Journée; H E Polak; M de Kleuver; D D Langeloo; A A Postma
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 5.  Intraoperative applications of the H-reflex and F-response: a tutorial.

Authors:  Ronald E Leppanen
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 6.  Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring: overview and update.

Authors:  David B Macdonald
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-07-11       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Distinct Corticocortical Contributions to Human Precision and Power Grip.

Authors:  Paolo Federico; Monica A Perez
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Effects of short interval intracortical inhibition and intracortical facilitation on short interval intracortical facilitation in human primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Aparna Wagle-Shukla; Zhen Ni; Carolyn A Gunraj; Nina Bahl; Robert Chen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Intracortical circuits modulate transcallosal inhibition in humans.

Authors:  L Avanzino; J T H Teo; J C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  A review of intraoperative monitoring for spinal surgery.

Authors:  Mark M Stecker
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2012-07-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.