Literature DB >> 11222826

Evaluation of local invasion by oesophageal carcinoma--a prospective study of prone computed tomography scanning.

J Wayman1, S Chakraverty, S M Griffin, G J Doyle, M J Keir, W Simpson.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the value of prone computed tomography compared with the traditional supine position, in the assessment of invasion of adjacent mediastinal structures by oesophageal cancer. A prospective, single blind case-case comparative study of signs of local tumour invasion was conducted. Sixty nine consecutive patients undergoing computed tomography for preoperative staging of oesophageal carcinoma were studied. Computed tomography scanning of the thorax was performed in the standard supine followed by prone position; in 39 patients the computed tomography findings were correlated with the surgical findings. Four established radiological signs used to assess mediastinal invasion were scored in each case. Based on the radiological scoring system, there was a significant down staging in the probability of aortic invasion in 12 of the 69 cases (p<0.05). A similar improvement in accuracy was seen in the cases undergoing surgery; of the 38 cases who did not have aortic invasion at operation, 10 cases were scored as high for aortic invasion on the supine scans compared with only three on the prone position (p<0.05). Prone scanning was not of significant additional value in the assessment of major airway or pericardial invasion. Modification of the computed tomography protocol to include scanning in the prone position will improve the accuracy of the preoperative staging of patients with oesophageal malignancy and reduce the chance of overstaging disease. Especially in centres where endoscopic ultrasound is not available, our modification may reduce the chance of denying patients potentially curative operations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11222826      PMCID: PMC1741949          DOI: 10.1136/pmj.77.905.181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med J        ISSN: 0032-5473            Impact factor:   2.401


  10 in total

1.  The role of computerized tomography in the staging of oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  S Rankin
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.350

2.  Non-surgical treatment of cancer of the oesophagus.

Authors:  S M Griffin; C S Robertson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Selection of operation for esophageal cancer based on staging.

Authors:  D B Skinner; A G Little; M K Ferguson; A Soriano; V M Staszak
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Staging of esophageal carcinoma: comparison of results with endoscopic sonography and CT.

Authors:  V Vilgrain; D Mompoint; L Palazzo; Y Menu; B Gayet; P Ollier; H Nahum; F Fekete
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Technical report: prone scanning in the CT assessment of oesophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  G J Doyle; W Simpson
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.350

6.  Preoperative TNM classification of esophageal carcinoma by endosonography.

Authors:  T L Tio; P P Coene; F C den Hartog Jager; G N Tytgat
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  1990-08

7.  Computed tomography in the staging of esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  D Picus; D M Balfe; R E Koehler; C L Roper; J W Owen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Carcinoma of the esophagus: CT vs MR imaging in determining resectability.

Authors:  S Takashima; N Takeuchi; H Shiozaki; K Kobayashi; S Morimoto; J Ikezoe; N Tomiyama; K Harada; K Shogen; T Kozuka
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Prone-supine change in organ position: CT demonstration.

Authors:  W S Ball; J D Wicks; F A Mettler
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Evaluation of the results of oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  A Mannell; P J Becker
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 6.939

  10 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  [MSCT for staging and response evaluation of esophageal cancer].

Authors:  K Holzapfel; E J Rummeny; C Hannig; A J Beer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  Chemoradiotherapy and surgery for T4 esophageal cancer in Japan.

Authors:  Yasunori Akutsu; Hisahiro Matsubara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  3D CT protocol in the assessment of the esophageal neoplastic lesions: can it improve TNM staging?

Authors:  V Panebianco; H Grazhdani; F Iafrate; M Petroni; M Anzidei; A Laghi; R Passariello
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Is 18F-FDG-PET useful for predicting R0 resection after induction therapy for initially unresectable locally advanced esophageal carcinoma?

Authors:  Keijiro Sugimura; Hiroshi Miyata; Masahiko Yano; Yoshitomo Yanagimoto; Moon Jeong Ho; Shogo Kobayashi; Hidenori Takahashi; Takeshi Omori; Masayuki Ohue; Masato Sakon
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-06-05

Review 5.  Imaging strategies in the management of oesophageal cancer: what's the role of MRI?

Authors:  Peter S N van Rossum; Richard van Hillegersberg; Frederiek M Lever; Irene M Lips; Astrid L H M W van Lier; Gert J Meijer; Maarten S van Leeuwen; Marco van Vulpen; Jelle P Ruurda
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  The Diagnostic Utility of Prone Position Chest CT for the Evaluation of Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Jong Eun Lee; Yun-Hyeon Kim; Hyo Hyun Shin; Won Gi Jeong; Kook Ju Na
Journal:  Chonnam Med J       Date:  2020-01-22

Review 7.  Staging esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Leslie Eisenbud Quint; Naama R Bogot
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2008-10-04       Impact factor: 3.909

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.