Literature DB >> 11222341

The effect of scleral search coil lens wear on the eye.

P J Murphy1, A L Duncan, A J Glennie, P C Knox.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Scleral search coils are used to measure eye movements. A recent abstract suggests that the coil can affect the eye by decreasing visual acuity, increasing intraocular pressure, and damaging the corneal and conjunctival surface. Such findings, if repeated in all subjects, would cast doubt on the credibility of the search coil as a reliable investigative technique. The aim of this study was to reassess the effect of the scleral search coil on visual function.
METHODS: Six volunteer subjects were selected to undergo coil wear and baseline measurements were taken of logMAR visual acuity, non-contact tonometry, keratometry, and slit lamp examination. Four drops of 0.4% benoxinate hydrochloride were instilled before insertion of the lens by an experienced clinician. The lens then remained on the eye for 30 minutes. Measurements of the four ocular health parameters were repeated after 15 and 30 minutes of lens wear. The lens was then removed and the health of the eye reassessed.
RESULTS: No obvious pattern of change was found in logMAR visual acuity, keratometry, or intraocular pressure. The lens did produce changes to the conjunctival and corneal surfaces, but this was not considered clinically significant.
CONCLUSION: Search coils do not appear to cause any significant effects on visual function. However, thorough prescreening of subjects and post-wear checks should be carried out on all coil wearers to ensure no adverse effects have been caused.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11222341      PMCID: PMC1723901          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.85.3.332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  6 in total

1.  Precise recording of human eye movements.

Authors:  H Collewijn; F van der Mark; T C Jansen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Binocular saccadic eye movements in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  J P Flipse; C S Straathof; J Van der Steen; A F Van Leeuwen; P A Van Doorn; F G Van der Meché; H Collewijn
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1997-05-01       Impact factor: 3.181

Review 3.  Quantitative ocular tests for myasthenia gravis: a comparative review with detection theory analysis.

Authors:  J J Barton
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1998-02-18       Impact factor: 3.181

4.  Binocular co-ordination of human horizontal saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  H Collewijn; C J Erkelens; R M Steinman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  The influence of age on the fragility of the cornea.

Authors:  M Millodot; H Owens
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1984-10

6.  Human smooth pursuit: stimulus-dependent responses.

Authors:  J R Carl; R S Gellman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.714

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Eye tracking: empirical foundations for a minimal reporting guideline.

Authors:  Kenneth Holmqvist; Saga Lee Örbom; Ignace T C Hooge; Diederick C Niehorster; Robert G Alexander; Richard Andersson; Jeroen S Benjamins; Pieter Blignaut; Anne-Marie Brouwer; Lewis L Chuang; Kirsten A Dalrymple; Denis Drieghe; Matt J Dunn; Ulrich Ettinger; Susann Fiedler; Tom Foulsham; Jos N van der Geest; Dan Witzner Hansen; Samuel B Hutton; Enkelejda Kasneci; Alan Kingstone; Paul C Knox; Ellen M Kok; Helena Lee; Joy Yeonjoo Lee; Jukka M Leppänen; Stephen Macknik; Päivi Majaranta; Susana Martinez-Conde; Antje Nuthmann; Marcus Nyström; Jacob L Orquin; Jorge Otero-Millan; Soon Young Park; Stanislav Popelka; Frank Proudlock; Frank Renkewitz; Austin Roorda; Michael Schulte-Mecklenbeck; Bonita Sharif; Frederick Shic; Mark Shovman; Mervyn G Thomas; Ward Venrooij; Raimondas Zemblys; Roy S Hessels
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-04-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.