Y L Chan1, C B Leung, S C Yu, D K Yeung, P K Li. 1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Organ Imaging, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong. y1190chan@cuhk.edu.hk
Abstract
AIM: The study objective was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of non-breath-hold high resolution gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (Gd-MRA) with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the evaluation of allograft renal artery stenosis (ARAS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 17 renal transplant recipients (six men, 11 women, age 34-64 years) with a systolic bruit in the transplant region beyond the early post-operative period. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography was performed by non-breath-hold high resolution 3D acquisition in the oblique coronal plane using a 256 x 512 matrix.Digital subtraction angiography was performed with AP and oblique views and ARAS was graded as < or =50% or >50% diameter stenosis on the view that displayed the maximal narrowing. RESULTS: Digital subtraction angiography showed >50% stenosis in seven patients, all of whom were diagnosed correctly on Gd-MRA. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography diagnosed two patients with >50% stenosis which were not confirmed on DSA. Eight patients had no or < or =50% stenosis on both Gd-MRA and DSA. The sensitivity and specificity of Gd-MRA in revealing >50% stenosis were 100% and 75%, respectively, using DSA as the gold standard. CONCLUSION: High resolution Gd-MRA employing a non-breath-hold technique is highly sensitive in the diagnosis of ARAS greater than 50%. It is preferred as a non-invasive screening technique to DSA in suspected ARAS. Copyright 2001 The Royal College of Radiologists.
AIM: The study objective was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of non-breath-hold high resolution gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (Gd-MRA) with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the evaluation of allograft renal artery stenosis (ARAS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 17 renal transplant recipients (six men, 11 women, age 34-64 years) with a systolic bruit in the transplant region beyond the early post-operative period. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography was performed by non-breath-hold high resolution 3D acquisition in the oblique coronal plane using a 256 x 512 matrix.Digital subtraction angiography was performed with AP and oblique views and ARAS was graded as < or =50% or >50% diameter stenosis on the view that displayed the maximal narrowing. RESULTS: Digital subtraction angiography showed >50% stenosis in seven patients, all of whom were diagnosed correctly on Gd-MRA. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography diagnosed two patients with >50% stenosis which were not confirmed on DSA. Eight patients had no or < or =50% stenosis on both Gd-MRA and DSA. The sensitivity and specificity of Gd-MRA in revealing >50% stenosis were 100% and 75%, respectively, using DSA as the gold standard. CONCLUSION: High resolution Gd-MRA employing a non-breath-hold technique is highly sensitive in the diagnosis of ARAS greater than 50%. It is preferred as a non-invasive screening technique to DSA in suspected ARAS. Copyright 2001 The Royal College of Radiologists.