Literature DB >> 11222054

Lesions of the entorhinal cortex impair acquisition of hippocampal-dependent trace conditioning.

J W Ryou1, S Y Cho, H T Kim.   

Abstract

Rabbits with the electrolytic lesions of bilateral entorhinal cortex (EC) were trained with the hippocampal-dependent trace conditioning of the nictitating membrane response. The multiple-unit activity of the hippocampal CA1 region was recorded during conditioning. The conditioned stimulus was a tone (1 kHz, 85 dB, 200-ms duration), the unconditioned stimulus was a corneal air puff (3 psi, 150-ms duration), and the interstimulus interval was 750 ms. The EC-lesioned animals showed only 30% conditioned response (CR) by the ninth session while the sham-operated animals showed above 80% CR. The lesioned animals did not show learning-related changes in the hippocampal activity. When the training was switched to the 300-ms interstimulus interval trace conditioning, both groups learned above 80% CR. The EC-lesioned animals, however, showed less learning-related activity in the hippocampus than the sham-operated animals. These results suggest that the development of the learning-related activity in the hippocampus depends on the intact EC, and that the EC may provide a possible pathway conveying learning information from the cerebellum or cerebral cortex to the hippocampus during the trace conditioning. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11222054     DOI: 10.1006/nlme.2000.3966

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem        ISSN: 1074-7427            Impact factor:   2.877


  24 in total

1.  Multiple sites of extinction for a single learned response.

Authors:  Brian E Kalmbach; Michael D Mauk
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  NMDA receptor-dependent processes in the medial prefrontal cortex are important for acquisition and the early stage of consolidation during trace, but not delay eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Kaori Takehara-Nishiuchi; Shigenori Kawahara; Yutaka Kirino
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Gamma oscillations coordinate amygdalo-rhinal interactions during learning.

Authors:  Elizabeth P Bauer; Rony Paz; Denis Paré
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Learning-related facilitation of rhinal interactions by medial prefrontal inputs.

Authors:  Rony Paz; Elizabeth P Bauer; Denis Paré
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Grid cell firing may arise from interference of theta frequency membrane potential oscillations in single neurons.

Authors:  Michael E Hasselmo; Lisa M Giocomo; Eric A Zilli
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.899

6.  Perirhinal and postrhinal, but not lateral entorhinal, cortices are essential for acquisition of trace eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Eugénie E Suter; Craig Weiss; John F Disterhoft
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 2.460

7.  Subcellular interactions between parallel fibre and climbing fibre signals in Purkinje cells predict sensitivity of classical conditioning to interstimulus interval.

Authors:  Jeanette Hellgren Kotaleski; David Lester; Kim T Blackwell
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2002 Oct-Dec

8.  Deficits in trace cued fear conditioning in galanin-treated rats and galanin-overexpressing transgenic mice.

Authors:  Jefferson W Kinney; Grzegorz Starosta; Andrew Holmes; Craige C Wrenn; Rebecca J Yang; Ashley P Harris; Katharine C Long; Jacqueline N Crawley
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.460

9.  Muscarinic receptors in perirhinal cortex control trace conditioning.

Authors:  Sun Jung Bang; Thomas H Brown
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Cholinergic receptor activation supports persistent firing in layer III neurons in the medial entorhinal cortex.

Authors:  Arthur Jochems; Antonio Reboreda; Michael E Hasselmo; Motoharu Yoshida
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.