Literature DB >> 11222000

What's in a shape? Children represent shape variability differently than adults when naming objects.

M Abecassis1, M D Sera, A Yonas, J Schwade.   

Abstract

Children and adults often generalize a word to objects of the same shape. However, the shape properties on which generalization is based are unknown. We investigated the degree to which two shape dimensions were represented categorically by children and adults when learning names for objects. Multidimensional scaling techniques were used to establish the perceptual similarity of two sets of objects in Experiment 1. In Experiments 2 and 3, children (from 2;8 to 4;5 years of age) and adults participated in two tasks in which they learned a novel name for an exemplar. We then examined how often the novel name was generalized to different objects and to line drawings of the objects. In one task, participants generalized the names from memory; in a second task the exemplar was in front of the participant during generalization. Adults accepted names more often to objects that fell "within" the proposed shape boundaries than to objects that fell "across" the boundaries. Children, however, were just as likely to generalize names to novel objects that fell within as to objects that crossed the boundaries. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11222000     DOI: 10.1006/jecp.2000.2573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol        ISSN: 0022-0965


  13 in total

1.  Object identification and lexical/semantic access in children: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of word-picture matching.

Authors:  Vincent J Schmithorst; Scott K Holland; Elena Plante
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Generic language and judgements about category membership: Can generics highlight properties as central?

Authors:  Michelle A Hollander; Susan A Gelman; Lakshmi Raman
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2009-05

3.  Relations among early object recognition skills: Objects and letters.

Authors:  Elaine Augustine; Susan S Jones; Linda B Smith; Erica Longfield
Journal:  J Cogn Dev       Date:  2015-04-01

4.  Early biases and developmental changes in self-generated object views.

Authors:  Alfredo F Pereira; Karin H James; Susan S Jones; Linda B Smith
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Developmental changes in visual object recognition between 18 and 24 months of age.

Authors:  Alfredo F Pereira; Linda B Smith
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2009-01

6.  Infants and toddlers show enlarged visual sensitivity to nonaccidental compared with metric shape changes.

Authors:  Greet Kayaert; Johan Wagemans
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2010-12-20

7.  A developmental difference in shape processing and word-shape associations between 4 and 6.5 year olds.

Authors:  Bart Ons; Johan Wagemans
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2012-07-18

8.  Changes in visual object recognition precede the shape bias in early noun learning.

Authors:  Meagan Yee; Susan S Jones; Linda B Smith
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-12-03

9.  Earlier development of analytical than holistic object recognition in adolescence.

Authors:  Elley Wakui; Martin Jüttner; Dean Petters; Surinder Kaur; John E Hummel; Jules Davidoff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Unsupervised invariance learning of transformation sequences in a model of object recognition yields selectivity for non-accidental properties.

Authors:  Sarah M Parker; Thomas Serre
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.