Literature DB >> 11221393

Moral sensitivity: some differences between nurses and physicians.

K Lützén1, A Johansson, G Nordström.   

Abstract

We report the results of an investigation of nurses' and physicians' sensitivity to ethical dimensions of clinical practice. The sample consisted of 113 physicians working in general medical settings, 665 psychiatrists, 150 nurses working in general medical settings, and 145 nurses working in psychiatry. The instrument used was the Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire (MSQ), a self-reporting Likert-type questionnaire consisting of 30 assumptions related to moral sensitivity in health care practice. Each of these assumptions was categorized into a theoretical dimension of moral sensitivity: relational orientation, structuring moral meaning, expressing benevolence, modifying autonomy, experiencing moral conflict, and following the rules. Significant differences in responses were found between health care professionals from general medical settings and those working in psychiatry. The former agreed to a greater extent with the assumptions in the categories 'meaning' and 'autonomy' and to a lesser degree with the categories 'benevolence' and 'conflict'. Moreover, those from the psychiatric sector agreed to a greater extent to the use of coercion if necessary. Significant differences were also found for some of the MSQ categories, between physicians and nurses, and between males and females.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11221393     DOI: 10.1177/096973300000700607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Ethics        ISSN: 0969-7330            Impact factor:   2.874


  11 in total

1.  The Relationship Between Nurses' Ethical Sensitivity Levels and Their Attitudes Toward Principles About Die with Dignity.

Authors:  Birgül Cerit; Simge Çoşkun; Mehmet Ali Çalışkan; Gülnur Temelli
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2020-10-30

2.  Ethics education and moral decision-making in clinical commissioning: an interview study.

Authors:  Selena Knight; Benedict Wj Hayhoe; Lucy Frith; Mark Ashworth; Imran Sajid; Andrew Papanikitas
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Rethinking moral distress: conceptual demands for a troubling phenomenon affecting health care professionals.

Authors:  Daniel W Tigard
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2018-12

4.  A Study of How Moral Courage and Moral Sensitivity Correlate with Safe Care in Special Care Nursing.

Authors:  Fateme Mohammadi; Banafsheh Tehranineshat; Afsaneh Ghasemi; Mostafa Bijani
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2022-07-13

5.  Framing the issues: moral distress in health care.

Authors:  Bernadette M Pauly; Colleen Varcoe; Jan Storch
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2012-03

6.  Relationship of Moral Sensitivity and Distress Among Physicians.

Authors:  Nasrin Nejadsarvari; Mahmoud Abbasi; Fariba Borhani; Ali Ebrahimi; Hamidreza Rasooli; Mohammad Hosein Kalantar Motamedi; Mehrzad Kiani; Shabnam Bazmi
Journal:  Trauma Mon       Date:  2015-05-20

7.  Measuring value sensitivity in medicine.

Authors:  Christian Ineichen; Markus Christen; Carmen Tanner
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 2.652

8.  How do healthcare professionals respond to ethical challenges regarding information management? A review of empirical studies.

Authors:  Cornelius Ewuoso; Susan Hall; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Glob Bioeth       Date:  2021-04-05

9.  The Predictors of Moral Sensitivity Among Physicians.

Authors:  Nada Alyousefi; Aljouhara Alibrahim; Haifaa Taleb; Lama Alotaibi; Leena Alrahmah; Noorah Aldubaib; Shahad Aljebreen; Norah Alrowais; Jamal Aljarallah
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-10-14

10.  Assessing a group of physicians' ethical sensitivity in Turkey.

Authors:  M Cetin; M Cimen
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 1.429

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.