Literature DB >> 11220483

Wound infection in gynecologic surgery.

A A Kamat1, L Brancazio, M Gibson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the wound infection rate among patients undergoing elective gynecologic surgery at a single tertiary care center and to determine the predictive value of various factors that contribute to infection. We further investigated the adequacy of hospital records in documenting infection rates as well as the timing of presentation of wound infections.
METHODS: The records of 115 patients undergoing elective gynecologic surgery at our institution were reviewed. Patients were further subdivided based on route of surgery. We analyzed the importance of antibiotic prophylaxis, route of surgery, smoking, diabetes, and body mass index (BMI).
RESULTS: The overall wound infection rate was 12.17% with no significant difference in the subgroups by route of surgery. Overall, antibiotic prophylaxis significantly decreased infection rates (P = 0.0118), but the route of surgery, BMI, smoking, and diabetes were not significant predictors of infection. Only one case of infection was detected during the initial hospital stay (6.1%). Fifty percent of the patients with infection required readmission, and of these 35.7% required an additional surgical procedure. The average length of hospital stay was 2.4 days longer in patients with infection.
CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic prophylaxis has a role in the management of patients undergoing abdominal gynecologic surgery. In today's environment of cost containment, an increased hospital stay and the added likelihood of additional surgical intervention associated with wound infection are important targets for prevention. Most patients with wound infection were diagnosed after discharge from the hospital. In our population, among whom transportation problems and remote residence are prevalent, strategies for infection surveillance should be integral to discharge planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11220483      PMCID: PMC1784694          DOI: 10.1155/S1064744900000338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1064-7449


  4 in total

1.  The epidemiology of wound infection. A 10-year prospective study of 62,939 wounds.

Authors:  P J Cruse; R Foord
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.741

2.  Avoiding serious infections associated with abdominal hysterectomy: a meta-analysis of antibiotic prophylaxis.

Authors:  R Mittendorf; M P Aronson; R E Berry; M A Williams; B Kupelnick; A Klickstein; A L Herbst; T C Chalmers
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Cefoxitin for prophylaxis in premenopausal women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  D L Hemsell; F G Cunningham; S Kappus; B Nobles
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Prevention of major infection after elective abdominal hysterectomy: individual determination required.

Authors:  D L Hemsell; J Reisch; B Nobles; P G Hemsell
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1983-11-01       Impact factor: 8.661

  4 in total
  5 in total

1.  A preoperative low nutritional prognostic index correlates with the incidence of incisional surgical site infections after bowel resection in patients with Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Maeda; Hisashi Nagahara; Masatsune Shibutani; Hiroshi Otani; Katsunobu Sakurai; Takahiro Toyokawa; Hiroaki Tanaka; Naoshi Kubo; Kazuya Muguruma; Noriko Kamata; Hirokazu Yamagami; Kosei Hirakawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Nutritional risk index as a predictor of postoperative wound complications after gastrectomy.

Authors:  Cheong Ah Oh; Dae Hoon Kim; Seung Jong Oh; Min Gew Choi; Jae Hyung Noh; Tae Sung Sohn; Jae Moon Bae; Sung Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Economic Evaluation of Adjunctive Azithromycin Prophylaxis for Cesarean Delivery.

Authors:  Lorie M Harper; Meredith Kilgore; Jeff M Szychowski; William W Andrews; Alan T N Tita
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 4.  Improving wound healing and preventing surgical site complications of closed surgical incisions: a possible role of Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Alessandro Scalise; Roberto Calamita; Caterina Tartaglione; Marina Pierangeli; Elisa Bolletta; Matteo Gioacchini; Rosaria Gesuita; Giovanni Di Benedetto
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 5.  Growth factors, silver dressings and negative pressure wound therapy in the management of hard-to-heal postoperative wounds in obstetrics and gynecology: a review.

Authors:  Paweł Jan Stanirowski; Anna Wnuk; Krzysztof Cendrowski; Włodzimierz Sawicki
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 2.344

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.