Literature DB >> 11220303

Regulation of urease gene expression by Streptococcus salivarius growing in biofilms.

Y H Li1, Y Y Chen, R A Burne.   

Abstract

The metabolism of urea by urease enzymes of oral bacteria profoundly influences oral biofilm pH homeostasis and oral microbial ecology. The purpose of this study was to gain insight into the regulation of expression of the low pH-inducible urease genes in populations of Streptococcus salivarius growing in vitro in biofilms and to explore whether urease regulation or the levels of urease expression in biofilm cells differed significantly from planktonic cells. Two strains of S. salivarius harbouring urease promoter fusions to a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (cat) gene were used: PurelCAT, containing a fusion to the full-length, pH-sensitive promoter; or Pureldelta100CAT, a constitutively derepressed deletion derivative of the urease gene promoter. The strains were grown in a Rototorque biofilm reactor in a tryptone-yeast extract-sucrose medium with or without pH control. Both CAT and urease activities in biofilms were measured at 'quasi-steady state' and after a 25mM glucose pulse. The results showed that CAT expression in PurelCAT was repressed at relatively neutral pH values, and that expression could be induced by acidic pH after carbohydrate challenge. Biofilms of PurelCAT grown at low pH, without buffering, had about 20-fold higher CAT levels, and only a modest further induction could be elicited with carbohydrate pulsing. The levels of CAT in biofilms of PurelCAT grown in buffered medium were slightly higher than those reported for planktonic cells cultured at pH 7.0, and the levels of CAT in Purel-CAT growing at low pH or after induction were similar to those reported for fully induced planktonic cells. CAT activity in Pureldelta100CAT was constitutively high, regardless of growth conditions. Interestingly, urease activity detected in biofilms of the parent strain, S. salivarius 57.1, could be as much as 130-fold higher than that reported for fluid chemostat cultures grown under similar conditions. The higher level of urease activity in biofilms was probably caused by the accumulation of the stable urease enzyme within biofilm cells, low pH microenvironments and the growth phase of populations of cells in the biofilm. The ability of S. salivarius biofilm cells to upregulate urease expression in response to pH gradients and to accumulate greater quantities of urease enzyme when growing in biofilms may have a significant impact on oral biofilm pH homeostasis and microbial ecology in vivo. Additionally, S. salivarius carrying the pH-sensitive urease gene promoter fused to an appropriate reporter gene may be a useful biological probe for sensing biofilm pH in situ.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11220303     DOI: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2000.00088.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 1462-2912            Impact factor:   5.491


  11 in total

1.  Could alkali production be considered an approach for caries control?

Authors:  V V Gordan; C W Garvan; M E Ottenga; R Schulte; P A Harris; D McEdward; I Magnusson
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Urease activity as a risk factor for caries development in children during a three-year study period: a survival analysis approach.

Authors:  E Morou-Bermudez; A Elias-Boneta; R J Billings; R A Burne; V Garcia-Rivas; V Brignoni-Nazario; E Suárez-Pérez
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 2.633

3.  Urease activity in dental plaque and saliva of children during a three-year study period and its relationship with other caries risk factors.

Authors:  E Morou-Bermudez; A Elias-Boneta; R J Billings; R A Burne; V Garcia-Rivas; V Brignoni-Nazario; E Suarez-Perez
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 2.633

4.  Virulence Factors Produced by Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms Have a Moonlighting Function Contributing to Biofilm Integrity.

Authors:  Alexander C Graf; Anne Leonard; Manuel Schäuble; Lisa M Rieckmann; Juliane Hoyer; Sandra Maass; Michael Lalk; Dörte Becher; Jan Pané-Farré; Katharina Riedel
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 5.911

5.  Cell density modulates acid adaptation in Streptococcus mutans: implications for survival in biofilms.

Authors:  Y H Li; M N Hanna; G Svensäter; R P Ellen; D G Cvitkovitch
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Global gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms.

Authors:  Karen E Beenken; Paul M Dunman; Fionnuala McAleese; Daphne Macapagal; Ellen Murphy; Steven J Projan; Jon S Blevins; Mark S Smeltzer
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  DNA microarray-based global transcriptional profiling of Yersinia pestis in multicellularity.

Authors:  Jingfu Qiu; Zhaobiao Guo; Haihong Liu; Dongsheng Zhou; Yanping Han; Ruifu Yang
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 3.422

8.  The evolution of host specialization in the vertebrate gut symbiont Lactobacillus reuteri.

Authors:  Steven A Frese; Andrew K Benson; Gerald W Tannock; Diane M Loach; Jaehyoung Kim; Min Zhang; Phaik Lyn Oh; Nicholas C K Heng; Prabhu B Patil; Nathalie Juge; Donald A Mackenzie; Bruce M Pearson; Alla Lapidus; Eileen Dalin; Hope Tice; Eugene Goltsman; Miriam Land; Loren Hauser; Natalia Ivanova; Nikos C Kyrpides; Jens Walter
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 9.  An update on the management of endodontic biofilms using root canal irrigants and medicaments.

Authors:  Zahed Mohammadi; Mohammad Karim Soltani; Sousan Shalavi
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2014-03-08

10.  Activity of the Chimeric Lysin ClyR against Common Gram-Positive Oral Microbes and Its Anticaries Efficacy in Rat Models.

Authors:  Jingjing Xu; Hang Yang; Yongli Bi; Wuyou Li; Hongping Wei; Yuhong Li
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 5.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.